I've been using Pynt for several months now, and it has become an indispensable tool for our API security testing. Here’s a detailed look at my experience and why I highly recommend it to others in the industry.
Broad Capabilities:
Pynt offers a robust suite of features that extends beyond its notable integrations, such as Postman. What stands out is its comprehensive approach to API security testing. Whether you're working with REST, SOAP, or GraphQL APIs, Pynt has the capabilities to thoroughly test and secure them. The platform provides in-depth vulnerability assessments and compliance checks, which are crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of our applications.
Versatility and Integrations:
While Pynt's integration with Postman is a highlight, it's worth noting that its value extends much further. The tool integrates seamlessly with various CI/CD pipelines and other security tools, which enhances our workflow and ensures that security checks are a continuous part of our development process. This flexibility allows for better customization and integration into our existing systems, making security testing a natural part of our development cycle.
Clarity on Offerings:
Pynt offers a "free tier" that is particularly beneficial for small teams or individual developers. This tier provides access to essential features that allow users to get a feel for the platform's capabilities before committing to more advanced plans. It's important to clarify that while there is a free tier, some advanced features are part of the paid plans. This structure helps users scale their usage according to their needs and budget.
Ease of Use and Impact:
One of the most impressive aspects of Pynt is its user-friendly interface. The platform is intuitive, with well-organized dashboards and easy-to-navigate menus. This makes it accessible even for those who may not have extensive experience with API security tools. The visual representation of data and results is particularly helpful, allowing users to quickly understand vulnerabilities and take appropriate action.
Authentic Experience:
My experience with Pynt has been positive overall. The tool has effectively identified several critical vulnerabilities that we were previously unaware of, helping us address these issues before they could become major problems. The support team has also been responsive and helpful whenever we had questions or needed assistance, which further enhances the overall experience.
Conclusion:
In summary, Pynt is a powerful and versatile tool for API security testing. Its broad capabilities, extensive integrations, and user-friendly design make it a valuable asset for any team concerned with securing their APIs. The availability of a "free tier" allows users to explore the tool's features, and the supportive team behind it adds to the overall positive experience. I highly recommend Pynt to anyone looking to enhance their API security and streamline their testing processes.
My playlist about Pynt
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdLZyV6tp2sqQiCyIPlBeeTCcutV5Rt09 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not seen much downside about pynt. Excellent customer support team Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What stands out most about Pynt is its seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing automated API security scans without disrupting the development workflow. It intelligently maps out API structures, identifies vulnerabilities (like injection, misconfigurations, or authorization flaws), and provides developer-friendly remediation guidance, which makes fixing issues far more efficient.
The fact that it requires no extra scripting or complex configuration is a huge plus—it runs security tests automatically from OpenAPI specs, Postman collections, or traffic captures. The real-time insights and clear severity ratings make it easier to prioritize fixes.
Overall, Pynt strikes a solid balance between developer usability and strong security coverage, which is often hard to find in API security tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
While Pynt is powerful and developer-friendly, one drawback is that its reporting and dashboard features can feel limited, especially when managing multiple APIs across large teams. It could benefit from more granular filtering, historical comparison, and export options to help track security posture over time.
Additionally, for more complex or custom API implementations, Pynt may miss certain business logic vulnerabilities that require deeper contextual understanding. In such cases, supplementing with manual testing or other tools becomes necessary.
Lastly, initial onboarding can feel a bit opaque for teams without OpenAPI specs or well-documented collections, which makes early setup slightly harder than expected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt is an useful security testing tooldesigned to help in API testing.Postman is my go to tool for API testing and Postman integrated with Pynt is useful to detect potential vulnerabilities.
As pynt is docker based, it needs very minimal set up and users can easily start using it.
In order to enhance your API security testing , I recommend Pynt as it helps to improve the robustness of your APIs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
When I first set up Pynt, I encountered some difficulties, but I must say the Pynt team was incredibly responsive and helpful in resolving my queries quickly. Their Slack channel is a valuable resource and made the entire process much smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- It covers OWASP TOP 10 API vulnerabilities and the tests are executed flawlessly with minimum to no efforts.
- Supports NEWMAN for command line execution or execution via Gitlab actions/Jenkins, etc.
- They provide free version which is also great for starters.
- The implementation is super easy Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The only hiccup I faced is "Having docker as a mandatory step", our organisation doesn't recommend using Docker but suggest different alternatives, so I cannot use Pynt as a free version due to this limitation for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt is crafted to be ease of use, allowing developers and security professionals to automate the task or testing that the testers done that manually. And it helps for saving time and efforts for manual testing. The implementation of the tool is easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt is only foucsing on API testings, it can be cover some of the other test like performance and load testing.And limitations in detecting complex vulnerabilites and some time it may provides false alarms, so it needs manual validations. The customer support is very slow in responsive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt makes API security testing easy by working directly with tools like Postman. It’s simple to set up and works well in our CI/CD pipeline. The Slack community is helpful and quick to respond to any issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The user interface is challenging. As a beginner, it’s hard for me to set up Postman. I recommend making it more user-friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt is a remarkable no-code security scanning tool that fills a significant gap in API testing. While many companies rely on Postman for API execution and testing, Postman lacks the capability to validate security vulnerabilities within collections. Pynt steps in to provide that crucial functionality, enabling seamless verification of existing Postman collections to uncover potential vulnerabilities.
One of the standout features of Pynt is its ease of use. Being Docker-based, it requires minimal setup, allowing users to get started quickly. The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users. I highly recommend Pynt for anyone looking to enhance their API security testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At present, I don't see any significant drawbacks with the Pynt tool. I had previously provided feedback on improving the HTML reporting feature, and I'm impressed by how swiftly the Pynt team, especially Ofer and Tzvika, addressed it. Their responsiveness to user feedback and commitment to continuous improvement is commendable. Pynt is a tool that evolves with its users' needs, and I look forward to seeing more enhancements in the future.
Additional Thoughts:
Pynt is not just a tool; it's a solution that empowers teams to elevate their API security practices. Its integration with existing workflows and the proactive support from the Pynt team make it a standout choice for any organization serious about API security. The fact that it's easy to set up and use means it can be quickly adopted without disrupting current processes, making it a vital asset for developers and testers alike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Being a functional tester, wanted to add security tests into Engineering testing. Pynt integration with Postman was smooth. Started to explore a new tool and the tool does most of the work. Able to see the reports from postman cli, it was helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Being a functional tester, used Pynt for learning purpose. As of now there is no downside. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pynt integrates easily into development workflows and simplifies and expedites API security testing. Rapid vulnerability discovery without interfering with current procedures is made possible by its automation features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Despite being simple to use, Pynt occasionally has compatibility issues in specific settings. Concerns over future support are also raised by the absence of active maintenance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Uses live testing and automation data to build security baselines to discovery and map API usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Process to setup the container and scanning process can be challenging. Required assistance from support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.