IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Reviews - Page 32

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

webMethods is an incredible administration that can permit you to share information between various programming applications and trade messages a great deal simpler. It has a full fledged IDE that gives you access to all that you have to fulfill this. There is obviously somewhat of an expectation to absorb information. I took a shot at a group of understudies who were attempting to use webMethods and we had a little inconvenience toward the starting however by and large had a positive involvement with webMethods Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

As a gathering we felt a general loathing for the way the IDE was setup. A portion of the elements that we would go searching for would be covered up and clouded in a convoluted interface. Others were more straightforward so it was somewhat of a give and take. Lamentably the backing for a venture of this greatness is somewhat missing and when we ran into issues and issues we thought that it was difficult to get help (We are understudies all things considered). On the other side of that since we were dealing with a school venture the application was somewhat thought up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Use the flow language to write the service logic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

There is no text to translate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

- Connect any system or application silo with plug-and-play ease

- Share data across systems

- Link mobile and SaaS apps securely with enterprise systems

- Use a single B2B gateway for connecting all trading partners

- Re-use services and systems to accelerate time to market

- Re-use existing assets to lower TCO

Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Expensive to get full education and training Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

1) Individual tool for each set of operations.

2) Constant upgrade in versions to improve and add features to meet the business requirements.

3) Awesome product that I have worked so far. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

1) Lack of complete guidelines to use new features.

2) Client who use webMethods are not high in number. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about webMethods BPM?

Pretty easy to build and maintain BPM applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about webMethods BPM?

Nothing as far the product or software is concerned, but the software support can be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

* Thanks to its easy to learn Flow language, it’s quite easy to build even complex integration processes

* As build on asynchronous messages exchanges, BPM are more robust against components outages compared to monolithic solution.

* Efficient clustered solution

* Lot of adapters Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

* Supervision tool (optimize for Infra) is only a joke at least up to 8.2 : It’s missing lot of important figures to really follow ISes’ health (I built in house monitoring based on Flow/Java probes + PHP GUI which is far far more informative than O4I is providing).

* Every patch campaigns needs long regression testings … due to bug and regression introduced by fixes.

* Starting 9.x, administration tools were totally jeopardized among several interfaces : IS Admin, MWS, Terracotta, UM, …

* not always OpenSources friendly. Especially, web services are quite limited (a shame for such product) and I had to fight against wM to make them usable by PHP WS clients : wM's WS stack doesn't support all variants of WS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

If you have EDI integrations in your B2B and supply chain management, Software AG webMethods platform is the best fit. It has built-in database (Trading Network) and rules setup and the only thing left to do is mapping (between EDI data and data of other source / target systems like SAP / Siebel CRM) . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

webMethods JDBC adapter release has not been updated for years and it doesn't support structure and array. We have to write Java code to deal with this kind of store procedure calls. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

It's very good for the intended purpose of being able to run integrations on a server. They have good customer support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The software can be finnicky at times and run into issues that will require you to restart the server, or perform larger fixes with help of customer support, which can slow progress significantly at times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Features of webmethods product such as API Management, Big memory, IS, MWS, Messaging layer(UM).

Also HA setup using terracotta is one best cache mechanisms Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Management talks about licensing cost is to high and they always look for new products with better cost Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

With its extended capabilities to connect between many contrasting systems & applications it has the extensive capabilities along with B2B integration and is able to securely share data across the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

webMethods is great but using Designer might be some hassle sometimes. To understand the tools and configuration is a good amount of learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.