Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SAP Ariba and SAP Fieldglass 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
SAP Ariba
Star Rating
(663)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SAP AribaSAP Fieldglass
Star Rating
(415)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SAP FieldglassFeatured Products
Sponsored
BILL AP/AR
(1200)
Contract Management
Visit Website
Sponsored
Flxpoint
(79)
Contract Management
Visit Website
Sponsored
Ergonode PIM
(28)
Contract Management
Visit Website
SAP Ariba vs SAP Fieldglass
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SAP Fieldglass easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with SAP Fieldglass overall.
- Reviewers felt that SAP Fieldglass meets the needs of their business better than SAP Ariba.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SAP Fieldglass is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SAP Fieldglass over SAP Ariba.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SAP Ariba
No pricing availableSAP Fieldglass
No pricing availableFree Trial
SAP Ariba
No trial information availableSAP Fieldglass
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
479
9.1
335
Ease of Use
8.0
497
8.9
343
Ease of Setup
7.7
237
8.7
198
Ease of Admin
7.9
161
8.8
122
Quality of Support
7.8
457
8.9
316
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
165
8.9
121
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
449
9.3
322
Features by Category
Contract Management Platform Features
8.4
122
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
116
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
122
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
112
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
120
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
125
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
122
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
108
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
121
|
Verified
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.5
18
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Contract Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Setup
8.6
74
Not enough data
8.6
75
Not enough data
8.5
73
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
71
Not enough data
8.3
70
Not enough data
8.4
68
Not enough data
8.4
77
Not enough data
Payment Cards
8.6
43
Not enough data
8.1
43
Not enough data
8.1
42
Not enough data
Reporting
8.1
47
Not enough data
8.0
48
Not enough data
8.3
48
Not enough data
8.0
47
Not enough data
Payments
8.4
48
Not enough data
8.4
48
Not enough data
7.9
45
Not enough data
7.8
44
Not enough data
Fraud & Risk Management
8.4
47
Not enough data
7.9
41
Not enough data
8.4
44
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Spend Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.5
116
Not enough data
8.3
117
Not enough data
8.5
117
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
103
Not enough data
8.2
106
Not enough data
8.3
100
Not enough data
Supplier Information
8.3
115
Not enough data
8.2
110
Not enough data
8.3
112
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
150
Not enough data
8.6
148
Not enough data
8.3
144
Not enough data
8.6
148
Not enough data
Execution
8.4
151
Not enough data
8.7
151
Not enough data
8.7
146
Not enough data
Analytics
8.6
149
Not enough data
8.5
151
Not enough data
8.5
151
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Procure to Pay
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.7
82
Not enough data
8.5
82
Not enough data
8.5
81
Not enough data
8.3
79
Not enough data
8.3
80
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
79
Not enough data
8.4
77
Not enough data
8.5
82
Not enough data
8.1
77
Not enough data
Recovery
8.5
79
Not enough data
8.4
79
Not enough data
AP Data Processing
8.6
79
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
Invoice Generation
8.3
116
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
121
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
115
|
Verified
Not enough data
Invoice Processing
8.6
123
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
115
Not enough data
8.4
117
Not enough data
8.6
113
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
116
Not enough data
8.2
108
Not enough data
8.4
108
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
110
|
Verified
Not enough data
Integration
8.4
123
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
124
Not enough data
8.4
119
Not enough data
8.3
110
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Invoice Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.4
149
Not enough data
8.3
150
Not enough data
8.4
149
Not enough data
8.5
148
Not enough data
Planning
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.4
138
Not enough data
8.2
142
Not enough data
8.4
144
Not enough data
Invoice Management
8.2
135
Not enough data
8.3
141
Not enough data
8.3
138
Not enough data
Supplier Management
8.3
143
Not enough data
8.3
142
Not enough data
7.9
127
Not enough data
Execution
8.4
149
Not enough data
8.8
152
Not enough data
8.4
139
Not enough data
Invoice Processing
8.2
127
Not enough data
8.2
126
Not enough data
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.1
116
Not enough data
8.2
121
Not enough data
Supplier Information
8.2
134
Not enough data
8.1
130
Not enough data
8.3
136
Not enough data
Analytics
8.5
139
Not enough data
8.4
138
Not enough data
8.2
132
Not enough data
8.5
128
Not enough data
8.4
125
Not enough data
Integration
8.4
122
Not enough data
8.3
123
Not enough data
8.4
129
Not enough data
8.7
138
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Purchasing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Contract Creation & Management
8.7
72
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.7
67
Not enough data
8.6
73
Not enough data
Other Platform Features
8.6
72
Not enough data
8.6
69
Not enough data
8.1
70
Not enough data
8.3
69
Not enough data
8.3
72
Not enough data
Contract Data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.1
67
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.9
13
Not enough data
7.7
13
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Assessment
8.1
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Control
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
Reporting
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Supplier Marketplace
7.6
29
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
Contract Management
7.9
28
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
Data Collection
8.8
28
Not enough data
7.9
29
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
Project Management
8.3
30
Not enough data
8.3
29
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Strategic Sourcing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data management - Catalog Management
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
Product catalogs - Catalog Management
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
Integration - Catalog Management
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
Analytics and Reporting - Catalog Management
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Catalog Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vendor Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Revenue Recognition
Not enough data
9.1
229
Not enough data
8.8
200
Not enough data
8.8
207
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SAP Ariba and SAP Fieldglass share no categories
Unique Categories
SAP Ariba is categorized as Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), Accounts Payable (AP) and Spend Analysis, Procure to Pay, Spend Management, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), Invoice Management, Strategic Sourcing, Purchasing, Contract Management, Catalog Management, and Third Party & Supplier Risk Management
SAP Fieldglass is categorized as Vendor Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SAP Ariba
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SAP Fieldglass
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
10.3%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Accounting
5.6%
Pharmaceuticals
4.1%
Computer Software
3.8%
Other
70.2%
Staffing and Recruiting
25.8%
Information Technology and Services
11.4%
Accounting
8.8%
Human Resources
4.0%
Computer Software
3.8%
Other
46.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
SAP Ariba
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James E.
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
AS one of the oldest and most well-known procurement platforms it is solid, reliable and works well. Talks to all leading finance systems and has good reporting, analytics and purchasing functionality. Great for automating procure to pay processes
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Computer Software
Ariba is by far the system that has caused severe anguish and stress in my career. It is an awful, hugely antiquated UX, unintuitive, with consistent tech problems. I have to call Ariba tech support nearly every time I receive an RFP invite from a buyer (at...
SAP Fieldglass
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vyankatesh J.
Verified User in Insurance
1. It is user friendly 2. Very helpful to manage work time. 3.It becomes easy to add work hours according to the tasks.
Most Helpful Critical Review
RAMESH H.
Verified User in Management Consulting
We faced a lot of redundancies and performance lags
James E.
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
AS one of the oldest and most well-known procurement platforms it is solid, reliable and works well. Talks to all leading finance systems and has good reporting, analytics and purchasing functionality. Great for automating procure to pay processes
Vyankatesh J.
Verified User in Insurance
1. It is user friendly 2. Very helpful to manage work time. 3.It becomes easy to add work hours according to the tasks.
Verified User in Computer Software
Ariba is by far the system that has caused severe anguish and stress in my career. It is an awful, hugely antiquated UX, unintuitive, with consistent tech problems. I have to call Ariba tech support nearly every time I receive an RFP invite from a buyer (at...
RAMESH H.
Verified User in Management Consulting
We faced a lot of redundancies and performance lags
Discussions
What is SAP Ariba used for?
3 comments
NS
Hi there,
Ariba is mainly a procurement solution that is useful for supplier Contracts. If you are looking for a CLM solution that takes care of all...Read more
Is SAP Ariba the same as SAP?
3 comments
DC
I understand that "NO" is often used as a negative response or to indicate refusal or disagreement in English. If you have more context or additional text, I...Read more
What is a VMS in staffing?
2 comments
MR
It is a Vendor Management System, or software that will facilitate the procurement of staffing services between employers and the staffing suppliers who...Read more
I think the UI for FG must be a user friendly especially the setting options dont you think?
1 comment
SM
intial set up is litlle confusing. Once you do the set up i don't think user will be confused after set up. Read more
What is SAP fieldglass used for?
1 comment
JR
Fieldglass is used to manage the major workflows of a contingent workforce program. Things like submitting and selecting candidates, extending offers,...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
