Compare Salt Security and Traceable AI 
- Users report that Salt Security excels in API Discovery with a score of 9.8, highlighting its ability to automatically identify and catalog APIs, which reviewers mention significantly enhances visibility and management of API assets.
- Reviewers mention that Traceable AI shines in Quality of Support, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, with users praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- G2 users note that Salt Security has a higher Ease of Use rating at 9.2 compared to Traceable AI's 8.3, with many reviewers stating that Salt's intuitive interface simplifies the onboarding process for new users.
- Users on G2 report that Traceable AI offers superior API Testing capabilities, scoring 8.9, with reviewers highlighting its comprehensive testing features that help ensure API functionality and security before deployment.
- Reviewers mention that Salt Security's Data Security score of 9.2 reflects its robust measures for protecting sensitive information, with users appreciating features like real-time threat detection and response.
- Users say that while both products perform well in Compliance Monitoring, Salt Security's score of 8.7 is slightly lower than Traceable AI's, indicating that Traceable AI may provide more thorough compliance features that users find beneficial for regulatory adherence.
Attack traffic is probably the most consulted screen, however the security insights, sensitive information screens and endpoint autodiscovery are all also very useful
At our organization, we emphasize conducting meticulous Proof of Concept (POC) assessments involving at least three vendors before making product procurement decisions. This evaluation encompasses aligning the vendor's solution with our specific use cases,...
There are a few technical limitations that we've encountered, although I understand that Traceable.ai is actively working on improvements in these areas. Our use of the mirroring mechanism for certain endpoints has highlighted a few potential...
Attack traffic is probably the most consulted screen, however the security insights, sensitive information screens and endpoint autodiscovery are all also very useful
At our organization, we emphasize conducting meticulous Proof of Concept (POC) assessments involving at least three vendors before making product procurement decisions. This evaluation encompasses aligning the vendor's solution with our specific use cases,...
There are a few technical limitations that we've encountered, although I understand that Traceable.ai is actively working on improvements in these areas. Our use of the mirroring mechanism for certain endpoints has highlighted a few potential...
