Compare Red Hat OpenShift and Tanzu 
- Users report that Red Hat OpenShift excels in application deployment with a score of 9.2, while Tanzu's deployment capabilities are not explicitly rated but are generally perceived as slightly less robust, indicating a potential gap in user experience during deployment.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong development tools, but Tanzu's Developer Toolkit scores higher at 9.1 compared to OpenShift's 8.5, suggesting that users may find Tanzu's toolkit more comprehensive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that OpenShift's application performance monitoring is rated at 9.3, which is higher than Tanzu's offerings, indicating that users may benefit from more effective performance insights with OpenShift.
- Users on G2 report that OpenShift has a slight edge in ease of setup with a score of 8.1 compared to Tanzu's 7.8, suggesting that new users may find OpenShift easier to implement initially.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms offer strong orchestration capabilities, but Tanzu scores slightly higher at 9.1 compared to OpenShift's 9.0, indicating that users may prefer Tanzu for more advanced orchestration features.
- Users say that OpenShift's quality of support is rated at 8.4, which is comparable to Tanzu's 8.5, but some users have noted that Tanzu's support is more responsive, which could be a deciding factor for those prioritizing customer service.
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
The user interface could more more user friendly. Sometimes deploying servers could be quite slow and bugs appear in the control panel where webpages were not properly redirected to. However, reporting it to the support team seemed to have fixed this issue .
Tanzu is VMware application.it is very user friendly. we can impliment is very easely with our organization. if i am talking about integartion part it is also easy.no of fetures is also good you can Simplify platform operations across clouds and also Secure...
Tanzu implementation is so complex , may be it's my own point. Since we struggle to implement. TKGs is so simple to implement but TKGm is very complex , even after 6 months of struggle we couldn't implement & we dropped it ( even we have vmware support)....
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
Tanzu is VMware application.it is very user friendly. we can impliment is very easely with our organization. if i am talking about integartion part it is also easy.no of fetures is also good you can Simplify platform operations across clouds and also Secure...
The user interface could more more user friendly. Sometimes deploying servers could be quite slow and bugs appear in the control panel where webpages were not properly redirected to. However, reporting it to the support team seemed to have fixed this issue .
Tanzu implementation is so complex , may be it's my own point. Since we struggle to implement. TKGs is so simple to implement but TKGm is very complex , even after 6 months of struggle we couldn't implement & we dropped it ( even we have vmware support)....
