Compare ReadMe and Swagger UI 
- Users report that ReadMe excels in its "Versioning and Version History" feature, scoring a remarkable 9.6, which allows teams to easily track changes and updates, a crucial aspect for maintaining API documentation. In contrast, Swagger UI does not have a comparable feature, which some users find limiting for managing documentation revisions.
- Reviewers mention that ReadMe's "API Contracts" feature is highly rated at 9.8, providing clear and structured documentation that enhances collaboration between developers and stakeholders. Swagger UI, while useful, scores lower at 8.2, leading some users to feel that it lacks the same level of clarity and organization.
- G2 users highlight ReadMe's "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.4, making it a favorite for small businesses looking for a quick implementation. Conversely, Swagger UI's setup process, rated at 8.5, is perceived as more complex, which can be a hurdle for teams with limited technical resources.
- Users on G2 appreciate ReadMe's "Quality of Support," scoring 8.5, with many reviewers noting responsive customer service and helpful resources. Swagger UI, with a score of 8.3, has received mixed feedback, with some users expressing a desire for more comprehensive support options.
- Reviewers mention that ReadMe's "Knowledge Sharing" feature is rated at 9.4, facilitating effective collaboration and communication among team members. In contrast, Swagger UI's capabilities in this area are less robust, leading some users to feel that it lacks the same level of interactivity and engagement.
- Users say that ReadMe's "Customization" options, rated at 8.8, allow for a tailored experience that meets specific business needs, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to create a unique API documentation style. Swagger UI, while customizable, does not offer the same depth, with a lower score of 7.2, leaving some users wanting more flexibility.
- API Reference
- 3 Published Versions
- Markdown-based Editor
The ability for our users to test our APIs right in the developer hub is extremely useful. In addition to that, being able to provide developers with recipes that guide them on how to develop more challenging concepts & features is very valuable. Readme...
Lack of collaboration tools, no content resuse tools, hard to work with images and no options to put inline etc. They're constantly improving their API doc tools but really little focus on general user doc needs despite many recommendations over the years....
I don't know of a single alternative to Swagger UI for documenting & testing APIs that is as feature-rich. 1. Has in-build API testing which supports authentication custom payloads. 2. Can easily see all the different types of response models, errors -...
The ability for our users to test our APIs right in the developer hub is extremely useful. In addition to that, being able to provide developers with recipes that guide them on how to develop more challenging concepts & features is very valuable. Readme...
I don't know of a single alternative to Swagger UI for documenting & testing APIs that is as feature-rich. 1. Has in-build API testing which supports authentication custom payloads. 2. Can easily see all the different types of response models, errors -...
Lack of collaboration tools, no content resuse tools, hard to work with images and no options to put inline etc. They're constantly improving their API doc tools but really little focus on general user doc needs despite many recommendations over the years....
