Compare ProtoPie and UXPin 
- Users report that UXPin excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to get started quickly, while ProtoPie lacks a specific score in this area, indicating potential challenges for new users.
- Reviewers mention that UXPin's collaboration capabilities are robust, allowing for seamless teamwork, whereas ProtoPie users have noted limitations in collaboration software integration, which can hinder team workflows.
- G2 users highlight that UXPin offers a wider range of design templates, which enhances the prototyping process, while ProtoPie, despite its strengths, has fewer templates available, making it less versatile for diverse design needs.
- Users on G2 appreciate UXPin's quality of support, scoring it at 8.5, which is slightly higher than ProtoPie’s 8.3, suggesting that UXPin may provide more reliable assistance when users encounter issues.
- Reviewers mention that UXPin's performance tracking features, including asset performance and template usage, are more comprehensive compared to ProtoPie, which may lack detailed analytics for user engagement.
- Users say that UXPin's importing abilities are superior, allowing for easier integration of existing designs, while ProtoPie has received feedback indicating that its importing process can be cumbersome and less intuitive.
- High-fidelity prototyping features
- 2 prototypes, saved in Cloud
- 2 interaction recordings
- 2 active prototypes
- Interactions & animations
- States
It's advanced prototyping capabilities using functions via its simple interface , screen transition and components animation. Litteraly , while using protopie , we feel like the sky is the limit!
• Significant lack of parity when importing from Figma • Component libraries are very buggy with antiquated management and have never worked correctly • The desktop app’s cloud integration was done halfway with poor ability to manage and find files • No...
UXPin is extremely powerful for creating high-fidelity prototypes without the need to know coding. I could mimic the functionality I needed perfectly. I also like that both their web-based version and the desktop versions (both macOS and PC) have the same...
I can't work with the parts of the screen. Only simple tasks can be done.
It's advanced prototyping capabilities using functions via its simple interface , screen transition and components animation. Litteraly , while using protopie , we feel like the sky is the limit!
UXPin is extremely powerful for creating high-fidelity prototypes without the need to know coding. I could mimic the functionality I needed perfectly. I also like that both their web-based version and the desktop versions (both macOS and PC) have the same...
• Significant lack of parity when importing from Figma • Component libraries are very buggy with antiquated management and have never worked correctly • The desktop app’s cloud integration was done halfway with poor ability to manage and find files • No...
I can't work with the parts of the screen. Only simple tasks can be done.
