Compare ProcessWire and TYPO3 
- Users report that TYPO3 has a robust Content Authoring feature with a score of 8.3, but ProcessWire slightly edges it out with an 8.1, indicating that while both platforms are effective, TYPO3 may offer a more user-friendly authoring experience.
- Reviewers mention that ProcessWire excels in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0 compared to TYPO3's 6.5, suggesting that users find ProcessWire significantly easier to implement, which can be crucial for small businesses looking for quick deployment.
- G2 users highlight that ProcessWire's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, while TYPO3's is lower at 7.0, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using ProcessWire.
- Users on G2 report that TYPO3's Asset Management feature is rated at 7.4, but ProcessWire shines with a score of 9.1, suggesting that users appreciate the superior capabilities of ProcessWire in managing digital assets effectively.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have similar scores for User, Role, and Access Management at 8.7, indicating that users find both TYPO3 and ProcessWire equally effective in managing user permissions and roles.
- Users say that ProcessWire's SEO capabilities are rated at 9.1, significantly higher than TYPO3's 7.8, which suggests that ProcessWire may provide better tools and features for optimizing content for search engines, a critical aspect for online visibility.
The use of custom fields to build your own CMS from the ground up is unparalleled. Coming from Wordpress, all I knew was how to navigate the restrictions of very limited fieldtypes and try to force those to work for my e-commerce, blogs, non-profit...
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
The use of custom fields to build your own CMS from the ground up is unparalleled. Coming from Wordpress, all I knew was how to navigate the restrictions of very limited fieldtypes and try to force those to work for my e-commerce, blogs, non-profit...
With TYPO3 I made several hundred sites. From simple presentation sites to sites with high complexity. I also did for Universities with intranet, and for transport companies. It is easy to scale and uses the latest technical elements to develop a site. We...
The learning curve is very steep. Of the various CMS I have tried Typo3 was the most difficult to learn and teach. With a smaller, mostly European community there are probably other applications that would suit small to mid-size organizations better.
