Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Practice Fusion and Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
Star Rating
(60)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (78.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Practice Fusion
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Star Rating
(237)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (88.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Provider - Starting Price
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Tebra excels in Patient Case Management, with a score of 8.2, while Practice Fusion trails slightly behind at 8.1. Reviewers mention that Tebra's interface allows for seamless tracking of patient cases, enhancing overall workflow efficiency.
  • Reviewers mention that Tebra's Quality of Support is rated at 7.6, which is higher than Practice Fusion's 7.3. Users on G2 appreciate Tebra's responsive customer service, noting that they often receive timely assistance when issues arise.
  • Users say that Tebra's Clinical Documentation feature scores 8.1, while Practice Fusion shines with a score of 9.4. Reviewers mention that Practice Fusion offers more robust tools for clinical documentation, making it easier for providers to maintain accurate records.
  • G2 users report that Tebra's Workflow Optimization is rated at 7.9, compared to Practice Fusion's 9.1. Users highlight that Practice Fusion provides superior workflow management tools, which streamline administrative tasks significantly.
  • Reviewers mention that Tebra's Patient Portal scores 7.3, while Practice Fusion's portal is rated higher at 8.2. Users report that Practice Fusion's portal offers better patient engagement features, allowing for easier communication and appointment scheduling.
  • Users on G2 report that Tebra's Interoperability is rated at 7.8, while Practice Fusion excels with a score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that Practice Fusion's ability to integrate with various EHR systems enhances data sharing and improves care coordination.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Practice Fusion
No pricing available
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Clinical Automation
Contact Us
1 Provider - Starting Price
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Practice Fusion
No trial information available
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
52
8.3
200
Ease of Use
8.6
52
8.6
203
Ease of Setup
8.1
14
8.6
112
Ease of Admin
9.0
13
8.4
104
Quality of Support
7.3
44
7.6
197
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
11
8.2
104
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
48
7.9
196
Features by Category
Patient Relationship Management (PRM)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
9.2
14
Information Flow
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Patient Experience
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.9
12
Not enough data
9.1
13
Revenue Cycle ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
7.8
28
Clinical
Not enough data
8.0
25
Not enough data
7.7
25
Not enough data
7.6
22
Financial
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.1
26
8.3
12
Not enough data
Administrative
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Operations
8.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Interoperability
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
HIPAA Compliant MessagingHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
8.1
13
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Healthcare Claims ManagementHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.2
49
Efficiency
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
8.4
45
Not enough data
8.1
45
Not enough data
8.1
45
Accuracy
Not enough data
8.0
45
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.0
45
Clinical DocumentationHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
7.9
58
Operations
Not enough data
7.9
55
Not enough data
7.9
53
Not enough data
7.7
55
Not enough data
7.4
47
Not enough data
7.9
46
Not enough data
7.9
48
Not enough data
8.0
54
Not enough data
7.7
51
Generative AI
Not enough data
7.9
27
Clinical Workflow Management
9.1
11
8.3
44
8.9
9
8.4
39
9.2
10
7.7
42
9.4
12
8.1
51
Patient Health Information Management
9.2
10
8.6
48
8.7
9
7.8
45
9.7
10
8.2
47
Agentic AI - EHR
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
18
Patient Convenience
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.7
13
Not enough data
7.1
13
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
7.7
15
Administration
Not enough data
7.1
13
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
7.3
13
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
7.7
32
Patient-Centered Functions
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
7.3
15
Not enough data
8.0
27
Not enough data
6.4
12
Operations
Not enough data
7.9
14
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.6
14
Not enough data
7.1
14
Not enough data
8.1
27
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.1
11
Generative AI
Not enough data
6.7
9
Medical Practice ManagementHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
7.8
50
Operations Management
Not enough data
7.6
42
Not enough data
7.3
41
Not enough data
7.5
41
Not enough data
7.2
40
Added Efficiencies
Not enough data
7.4
40
Not enough data
8.2
43
Not enough data
8.0
35
Not enough data
8.0
45
Not enough data
9.2
8
Technology
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
8
Administration
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Compliance
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
8.0
8
Computer-Assisted Coding - Medical Coding
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
5.7
7
Admin and Tech Workflows - Medical Coding
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Medical Billing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Practice Fusion and Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) are categorized as EHR, Medical Practice Management, Medical Billing, and Patient Engagement
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
78.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
20.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
1.7%
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
88.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
9.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
1.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
Medical Practice
33.9%
Hospital & Health Care
32.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
11.9%
Pharmaceuticals
3.4%
Mental Health Care
3.4%
Other
15.3%
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Medical Practice
38.2%
Hospital & Health Care
25.8%
Mental Health Care
14.2%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
9.9%
Alternative Medicine
2.6%
Other
9.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
Most Helpful Favorable Review
James J.
JJ
James J.
Verified User in Government Relations

Cloud based hence secure to Store patient medical data. Customizable to meet user demands .No login problems. Ease of usage to both old and new users.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness

Their customer service is THE WORST. It took 8 business days to respond to one of our more serious complaints. Hours on the phone on hold with no resolution. We added a new prescriber and it was over 2 months before any of the features worked for her...

Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Joanne P.
JP
Joanne P.
Verified User in Alternative Medicine

Patient Pop is like an extra office assistant. It frees up my time, meaning I can get a lot more work done. Patient Pop gets me the lead information, handles new patient appointments, and best of all keeps track of it all.

Most Helpful Critical Review
TO
Tammy O.
Verified User in Medical Practice

We have found that Kareo/ Tebra is horrible. We have a programming issue with Medicare Part A as we are a Facility PT/ OT Therapy Billing. We have not been paid for any claims since 05/19/2023. We advised this is a urgent issue for our practice. We are...

Alternatives
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion Alternatives
Epic
Epic
Add Epic
eClinicalWorks
eClinicalWorks
Add eClinicalWorks
Carepatron
Carepatron
Add Carepatron
Birdeye
Birdeye
Add Birdeye
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) Alternatives
WebPT
WebPT
Add WebPT
NextGen Healthcare EHR
NextGen Healthcare EHR
Add NextGen Healthcare EHR
DrChrono by EverHealth.
DrChrono by EverHealth
Add DrChrono by EverHealth.
SimplePractice
SimplePractice
Add SimplePractice
Discussions
Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion Discussions
Who does customer support take so long to respond or to fix an issue?
1 comment
Louis S.
LS
i don't have an answer for you. hopefully the issue that you were having is resolvedRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Practice Fusion has no more discussions with answers
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)
Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop) Discussions
W
2 comments
John W.
JW
The question implies an inquiry about compensation for writing a positive review for PatientPop.Read more
Can I process credit card payments from patients using Kareo?
1 comment
Karen H.
KH
I am unable to translate this text as it is already in English. If you have text in an unknown language, please provide it for translation.Read more
Kareo system down again
1 comment
JK
Not surprising at all. Read more