- Home
- ...
- Student Information Systems (SIS)
- PeopleSoft
- SAP for Higher Education and Research
- PeopleSoft-vs-SAP for Higher Education and Research
Compare PeopleSoft Campus Solutions and SAP for Higher Education and Research 
- Users report that PeopleSoft Campus Solutions has a steeper learning curve, with an Ease of Use score of 6.8, while SAP for Higher Education and Research is noted for its more intuitive interface, reflected in its higher score of 7.5.
- Reviewers mention that the Quality of Support for SAP is rated at 8.1, significantly higher than PeopleSoft's 6.9, indicating that users find SAP's support team more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- G2 users highlight that PeopleSoft Campus Solutions struggles with product direction, scoring only 5.4, which leads to concerns about future updates and enhancements, whereas SAP's score of 7.7 suggests a more positive outlook on ongoing development and feature improvements.
- Users on G2 report that PeopleSoft's setup process is cumbersome, reflected in its Ease of Setup score, while SAP is praised for a smoother implementation experience, making it easier for institutions to get started.
- Reviewers say that PeopleSoft Campus Solutions excels in its comprehensive student information system features, but some users feel that it lacks modern integrations compared to SAP, which is noted for its robust integration capabilities with other educational tools.
- Users report that while both products serve the enterprise market well, SAP for Higher Education and Research is favored for its advanced analytics features, which help institutions make data-driven decisions more effectively than PeopleSoft's offerings.
Easy and logical navigation of the system. Customization for special reports/functions, such as quarterly reports, easy to set-up and access. I also enjoy having the "favorites" tab for tools used on a daily basis.
The User Interface makes the software very bland and early 2000s. They could seriously do with a graphics overhaul.
SAP has a interface that is very user friendly. O
SAP is rather "buggy" in terms of certain functions. For instance, scheduling classes is a long process involving multiple screens: screen one must be saved before screen two may be accessed/edited. There are times changes are not kept in spite of saving,...
Easy and logical navigation of the system. Customization for special reports/functions, such as quarterly reports, easy to set-up and access. I also enjoy having the "favorites" tab for tools used on a daily basis.
SAP has a interface that is very user friendly. O
The User Interface makes the software very bland and early 2000s. They could seriously do with a graphics overhaul.
SAP is rather "buggy" in terms of certain functions. For instance, scheduling classes is a long process involving multiple screens: screen one must be saved before screen two may be accessed/edited. There are times changes are not kept in spite of saving,...
