Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools
- Micro Focus SiteScope
- Red Hat OpenShift
- Micro Focus SiteScope-vs-Red Hat OpenShift
Compare OpenText SiteScope and Red Hat OpenShift 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText SiteScope
Star Rating
(31)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText SiteScopeRed Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(296)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftFeatured Products
Sponsored
Triton DataCenter
(11)
Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Visit Website
OpenText SiteScope vs Red Hat OpenShift
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText SiteScope easier to use and set up. However, Red Hat OpenShift is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Red Hat OpenShift overall.
- Reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift meets the needs of their business better than OpenText SiteScope.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Red Hat OpenShift over OpenText SiteScope.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText SiteScope
No pricing availableRed Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText SiteScope
No trial information availableRed Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
20
8.7
81
Ease of Use
8.3
20
8.2
224
Ease of Setup
8.2
12
7.8
192
Ease of Admin
8.3
12
8.6
57
Quality of Support
7.9
19
8.4
72
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.2
11
8.6
53
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
20
9.0
78
Features by Category
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Response
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
10.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Database
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
Management
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.0
28
Organization
Not enough data
8.5
30
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
9.0
29
Development
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
28
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText SiteScope and Red Hat OpenShift share no categories
Unique Categories
OpenText SiteScope is categorized as Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Orchestration, Container Management, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Server Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText SiteScope
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
37.5%
Banking
20.8%
Computer Software
12.5%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Government Administration
4.2%
Other
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
15.3%
Financial Services
13.9%
Banking
9.3%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Most Helpful Reviews
OpenText SiteScope
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Abdullah A.
Verified User in Banking
I'm monitoring many applications such as Ping tracking, Database query tracking, URL tracking without agency
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Government Administration
Some of the algorithms are too binary. If a certain sequence of events are not followed results may not be correct.
Red Hat OpenShift
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Luis Felipe B.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Government Administration
The downside is that it gets expensive when you run a lot of applications
Abdullah A.
Verified User in Banking
I'm monitoring many applications such as Ping tracking, Database query tracking, URL tracking without agency
Luis Felipe B.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
Verified User in Government Administration
Some of the algorithms are too binary. If a certain sequence of events are not followed results may not be correct.
Verified User in Government Administration
The downside is that it gets expensive when you run a lot of applications
Alternatives
Discussions
What is the latest version of SiteScope?
1 comment
96
The latest release of Micro Focus SiteScope is version 11.92 although we use Operations Bridge Release 2018 08 at work.Read more
OpenText SiteScope has no more discussions with answers
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
