Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and ScyllaDB

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Star Rating
(304)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.7% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDB
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that ScyllaDB excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking to grow, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB shines with a higher scalability score of 9.4, appealing to enterprises that require robust performance under heavy loads.
  • Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's auto sharding feature scores 8.6, which helps in distributing data efficiently, but users on G2 note that Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's auto sharding, with a score of 8.3, is less effective in certain scenarios, leading to potential performance bottlenecks.
  • G2 users highlight that ScyllaDB's data replication feature scores 8.6, providing reliable data availability, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers a slightly lower score of 8.1, indicating that users may experience challenges in maintaining data consistency across regions.
  • Reviewers say that the quality of support for ScyllaDB, rated at 8.3, is satisfactory, but users report that Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's support, with a score of 8.9, is more responsive and helpful, particularly for enterprise-level clients.
  • Users on G2 mention that ScyllaDB's ease of use is rated at 8.6, which is beneficial for small teams, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's ease of use score of 8.9 suggests a more user-friendly interface that appeals to a broader range of users, including those in larger organizations.
  • Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's data types support is rated at 8.4, which is adequate for many applications, but Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB stands out with a score of 8.8, indicating a wider variety of supported data types that can cater to diverse application needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing available
ScyllaDB
No pricing available
Free Trial
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
9
8.7
255
Ease of Use
8.9
9
8.7
264
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
8.3
172
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
110
Quality of Support
8.9
9
8.4
235
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
91
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
8
9.3
248
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.1
113
Data Management
Not enough data
8.3
104
Not enough data
8.3
109
Availability
Not enough data
8.7
103
Not enough data
8.2
101
Not enough data
8.3
101
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
97
Security
Not enough data
8.2
96
Not enough data
8.3
97
Not enough data
8.1
94
Not enough data
8.2
92
Support
Not enough data
8.1
92
Not enough data
8.0
99
Wide Column DatabaseHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
8.7
8
8.3
71
Storage
8.5
8
8.4
62
Scalability
9.4
8
9.0
67
8.3
6
8.6
64
Security
8.8
7
8.1
59
Support
8.8
8
8.4
66
7.9
7
8.4
65
9.0
8
8.2
61
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database as a Service (DBaaS)Hide 17 FeaturesShow 17 Features
Not enough data
8.5
128
Configuration
Not enough data
9.1
121
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.8
118
Not enough data
8.2
110
Not enough data
8.5
111
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.5
107
Not enough data
8.6
107
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
120
Not enough data
8.7
116
Not enough data
8.8
109
Not enough data
8.6
115
Security
Not enough data
8.6
99
Not enough data
8.5
100
Not enough data
8.5
100
Data Management
Not enough data
8.8
108
Not enough data
8.5
102
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database
Unique Categories
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has no unique categories
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.8%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Information Technology and Services
30.8%
Computer Software
23.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
15.4%
Insurance
7.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
7.7%
Other
15.4%
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Computer Software
21.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.7%
Financial Services
6.7%
Banking
4.0%
Computer & Network Security
3.7%
Other
49.7%
Most Helpful Reviews
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Consumer Services
GC
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Low-latency data access provided by Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is the most helpful feature. The automated partitioning, indexing and tunable consistency levels help the users to make changes according to their requirements.

Most Helpful Critical Review
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Amadou B.
AB
Amadou B.
Verified User in Computer Software

The fast response time and scalability of this database solution are amazing to me, coming from a SQL background. It also provides high availability and provides excellent uptime for critical workloads.

Most Helpful Critical Review
CE
Carter E.
Verified User in Higher Education

The pricing, the pricing, the pricing! Open is missing too many features for us to make it viable, the paid tier is just too much cost to justify. Used at my previous company, my current won't consider because of this. Lower requirements than some others.

Alternatives
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Alternatives
Hbase
Hbase
Add Hbase
Google Cloud BigTable
BigTable
Add Google Cloud BigTable
Cassandra
Cassandra
Add Cassandra
DataStax
DataStax
Add DataStax
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Alternatives
Cassandra
Cassandra
Add Cassandra
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Add Amazon DynamoDB
Redis Software
Redis Software
Add Redis Software
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Add Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Discussions
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB Discussions
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 comments
Peter C.
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x • Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator) • Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers