Compare Jellyfish and Waydev 
- Users report that Waydev excels in repository integration with a score of 9.7, allowing seamless connections with various version control systems, while Jellyfish falls behind with a score of 8.5, indicating potential limitations in integration capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Waydev's analytics and trends feature is highly praised, scoring 9.2, providing actionable insights into team performance, whereas Jellyfish, with a score of 8.9, may not offer the same depth of analysis.
- G2 users highlight Waydev's productivity updates, scoring 9.3, as a standout feature that keeps teams informed about their progress, while Jellyfish's score of 8.5 suggests it may not deliver updates as effectively.
- Users on G2 appreciate Waydev's historical data consolidation, scoring 9.0, which helps teams track their performance over time, while Jellyfish's score of 8.3 indicates it may not provide as comprehensive a view of historical data.
- Reviewers say that Waydev's quality of support is exceptional, with a score of 9.7, making it a reliable partner for businesses, compared to Jellyfish's score of 9.2, which, while still good, may not match the level of support offered by Waydev.
- Users report that Waydev's product direction is rated at 8.7, indicating a solid roadmap for future improvements, while Jellyfish shines with a higher score of 9.4, suggesting a more robust vision for its development, which could be a deciding factor for long-term users.
- 50 Repositories
- 6 Months Data Availability
- GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Azure DevOps Integrations
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
I've only dug into the repository analysis so far, but what I've seen that appdev helps you look at the data from multiple different angles. For example, the New work, refactor, help and churn categories are brilliant. That helps you understand the...
Customer onboarding support; product configuration; lack of kanban agile process support
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
I've only dug into the repository analysis so far, but what I've seen that appdev helps you look at the data from multiple different angles. For example, the New work, refactor, help and churn categories are brilliant. That helps you understand the...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
Customer onboarding support; product configuration; lack of kanban agile process support
