Compare Jellyfish and LinearB 
- Users report that Jellyfish excels in its Quality of Support, scoring 9.2, with many reviewers mentioning that the support team is responsive and knowledgeable, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that LinearB shines in Ease of Use, achieving a score of 8.9, with users highlighting its intuitive interface that simplifies navigation and enhances user experience.
- G2 users note that Jellyfish's Repository Integration is rated at 8.5, but some users feel it could benefit from more seamless connections with various repositories compared to LinearB's higher score of 9.0, which users say offers better integration capabilities.
- Users on G2 report that LinearB provides superior Analytics and Trends features, scoring 9.0, with reviewers mentioning that the insights generated are actionable and help teams make informed decisions.
- Reviewers say that Jellyfish's Historical Data Consolidation feature, rated at 8.3, is useful, but some users express a desire for more advanced analytics compared to LinearB's score of 8.7, which users report offers more comprehensive data analysis tools.
- Users say that while both products have strong Control features, Jellyfish's score of 8.4 is slightly lower than LinearB's 8.5, with reviewers mentioning that LinearB provides more robust options for managing project workflows effectively.
- No credit card required
- 5-minute self-onboard
- Upgrade any time
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
It had a lot of annoying notifications on Slack and emails. For example, if someone approved a Merge Request, you will receive the default GitLab notification, but also the LinearB (WorkerB) notification.
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
It had a lot of annoying notifications on Slack and emails. For example, if someone approved a Merge Request, you will receive the default GitLab notification, but also the LinearB (WorkerB) notification.
