Compare IBM App Connect and IBM DataPower Gateway 
- Users report that IBM App Connect excels in real-time integration with a score of 8.8, while IBM DataPower Gateway shines even brighter with a score of 9.2, indicating a stronger capability in handling real-time data flows.
- Reviewers mention that the API Designer feature in IBM App Connect received a high score of 9.3, showcasing its user-friendly interface for creating APIs, whereas IBM DataPower Gateway does not have a comparable rating for this feature, suggesting a potential gap in ease of API creation.
- G2 users highlight that IBM App Connect offers a robust set of pre-built connectors with a score of 9.3, making it easier to integrate with various applications, while IBM DataPower Gateway, although strong in security, does not emphasize this feature as much, which may limit integration flexibility.
- Users on G2 report that IBM App Connect's data transformation capabilities are rated at 9.7, indicating a superior ability to manipulate data formats, while IBM DataPower Gateway, although competent, does not match this level of performance in data transformation.
- Reviewers mention that IBM DataPower Gateway excels in security features, scoring 9.7 in security standards and 9.5 in data encryption, which is crucial for enterprises prioritizing data protection, while IBM App Connect, while still secure, does not reach these high scores.
- Users say that both products offer strong hybrid deployment options, with IBM App Connect scoring 9.5, matching IBM DataPower Gateway, which also scores 9.5, indicating that both solutions are equally capable in this area, providing flexibility for users looking to deploy across different environments.
1. No Coding approach 2. Inbuilt connectors can be used for integrating application in no time. 3. The CI Web Management console is user friendly. 4. SFDC Integration. 5. Working with Web Services/ WSDL is very easy.
Configuration, not coding approach means it isn't extensible for some common enterprise business scenarios. For example, a client had a requirement that involved encrypting a file and transferring it to an FTP server. After going back and forth with IBM...
Security for APIs , Multi protocol support, Routing algoritm, Speed of processing and Load Balancing capabilities and self balancing capabilities.
Costly as whole appliance need to be purchased, not used much by projects, have become legacy tool as other technologies have come
1. No Coding approach 2. Inbuilt connectors can be used for integrating application in no time. 3. The CI Web Management console is user friendly. 4. SFDC Integration. 5. Working with Web Services/ WSDL is very easy.
Security for APIs , Multi protocol support, Routing algoritm, Speed of processing and Load Balancing capabilities and self balancing capabilities.
Configuration, not coding approach means it isn't extensible for some common enterprise business scenarios. For example, a client had a requirement that involved encrypting a file and transferring it to an FTP server. After going back and forth with IBM...
Costly as whole appliance need to be purchased, not used much by projects, have become legacy tool as other technologies have come
