Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Other Web Frameworks Software
- GWT - Google Web Toolkit
- Material Design for Bootstrap
- GWT - Google Web Toolkit-vs-Material Design for Bootstrap
Compare GWT - Google Web Toolkit and Material Design for Bootstrap 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GWT - Google Web Toolkit
Star Rating
(15)3.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GWT - Google Web ToolkitMaterial Design for Bootstrap
Star Rating
(24)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (85.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Material Design for BootstrapSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that GWT - Google Web Toolkit has a lower star rating of 3.4 compared to Material Design for Bootstrap's 4.6, indicating a general preference for the latter among users.
- Users report that GWT's ease of use is rated at 8.1, which is slightly lower than Material Design for Bootstrap's 9.0, suggesting that users find the latter more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that GWT's quality of support is rated at 6.7, which falls short of Material Design for Bootstrap's 8.6, indicating that users may experience better assistance and resources with the latter.
- Users on G2 mention that GWT's product direction is rated at 5.6, which is significantly lower than Material Design for Bootstrap's 9.4, suggesting that users feel more confident in the future development and updates of Material Design for Bootstrap.
- Reviewers say that GWT is primarily favored by small businesses (70% of reviews), but Material Design for Bootstrap has an even higher percentage at 85.7%, indicating a stronger alignment with the needs of small business users.
- Users report that GWT has a total of 10 reviews, while Material Design for Bootstrap has 22, suggesting that the latter has a more extensive user base and potentially more feedback to inform new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GWT - Google Web Toolkit
No pricing availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No pricing availableFree Trial
GWT - Google Web Toolkit
No trial information availableMaterial Design for Bootstrap
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.3
8
9.2
19
Ease of Use
8.1
8
9.0
21
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.7
7
8.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
5.6
8
9.4
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GWT - Google Web Toolkit and Material Design for Bootstrap are categorized as Other Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
GWT - Google Web Toolkit has no unique categories
Material Design for Bootstrap has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GWT - Google Web Toolkit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Material Design for Bootstrap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Financial Services
10.0%
Biotechnology
10.0%
Other
20.0%
Computer Software
28.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
19.0%
Consulting
9.5%
Marketing and Advertising
9.5%
Oil & Energy
4.8%
Other
28.6%
Most Helpful Reviews
GWT - Google Web Toolkit
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Optimized and obfuscated JS. Java style client code
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Solutions are more verbose than other frameworks. Implementing normal JavaScript in the application is harder to debug and implement.
Material Design for Bootstrap
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Patricia T.
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Design web pages with a completely professional aspect, it is ideal for web-based administrative systems since it includes a huge amount of components such as text fields, datepickers, forms, tables, etc. It is compatible with all frontend frameworks known...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Automotive
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Optimized and obfuscated JS. Java style client code
Patricia T.
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Design web pages with a completely professional aspect, it is ideal for web-based administrative systems since it includes a huge amount of components such as text fields, datepickers, forms, tables, etc. It is compatible with all frontend frameworks known...
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Solutions are more verbose than other frameworks. Implementing normal JavaScript in the application is harder to debug and implement.
Verified User in Automotive
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
Discussions
GWT - Google Web Toolkit has no discussions with answers
Material Design for Bootstrap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
