Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GNU Octave and Simulink

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU Octave
Simulink
Simulink
Star Rating
(98)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Simulink
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Simulink excels in its 3D/solid modeling tools, receiving a score of 8.3, while GNU Octave shines with a remarkable score of 9.5 in the same category, indicating a stronger capability for users focused on advanced modeling.
  • Reviewers mention that Simulink's editing tools are rated at 8.8, which is higher than GNU Octave's score of 8.2, suggesting that users find Simulink's editing features more robust and user-friendly for their design needs.
  • G2 users highlight that Simulink's data visualization capabilities score 8.9, showcasing its strength in presenting complex data effectively, whereas GNU Octave does not have a comparable feature, which may limit its appeal for users prioritizing data presentation.
  • Users on G2 indicate that Simulink's continuous event modeling is rated at 8.4, outperforming GNU Octave's score of 7.9, suggesting that Simulink may be better suited for users needing reliable continuous event simulations.
  • Reviewers say that GNU Octave's hardware support is rated at 8.7, which is higher than Simulink's 7.8, indicating that users may find GNU Octave more compatible with a wider range of hardware setups.
  • Users report that Simulink's quality of support is rated at 8.0, while GNU Octave's support is slightly better at 8.2, suggesting that users may experience more responsive assistance with GNU Octave when encountering issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing available
Simulink
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information available
Simulink
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.4
82
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.0
88
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
39
7.9
86
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.9
87
Features by Category
8.4
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.5
13
8.3
22
Design
9.5
10
8.3
14
8.3
11
8.3
15
8.2
10
8.8
15
8.2
10
7.6
11
Tools
8.5
11
8.2
12
8.3
11
8.2
13
8.2
10
8.2
13
Work
9.0
10
9.1
15
7.9
11
8.4
16
8.2
11
8.6
13
8.8
11
8.3
8
8.0
11
8.2
13
Environment
8.7
10
7.7
14
8.5
11
8.0
17
8.3
10
8.2
10
9.0
10
8.7
17
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Simulink
Simulink
GNU Octave and Simulink are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave is categorized as Statistical Analysis
Simulink
Simulink has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
66.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
17.0%
Simulink
Simulink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
22.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
34.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.2%
Reviewers' Industry
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Simulink
Simulink
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Automotive
13.7%
Higher Education
10.5%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
8.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.3%
Other
43.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Most Helpful Favorable Review
shashank s.
SS
shashank s.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Octave is the best utility software which i have used for starting my machine learning.It is very easy to use and it is also very less demanding on cpu so,we can use it with an uninterrupted experience.It is very good for Algorithm development and it is...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Non-Profit Organization Management

Less functionality than Matlab. GNUplots aren;t that pretty. Lot of bugs as compared to Matlab. Less inbuilt functions.

Simulink
Simulink
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vineet B.
VB
Vineet B.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

1- Best-in-class environment to do all the analytics using block diagrams. 2- Visualization, user experience, and tool handling. 3- Another way to develop and simulate your Matlab designs is to develop systems using block diagrams in simulink. 4- More easy...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace

Not a lot of learning resources available

Alternatives
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Alternatives
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Posit
Posit
Add Posit
Mathematica
Mathematica
Add Mathematica
Simulink
Simulink Alternatives
Simcenter Amesim
Simcenter Amesim
Add Simcenter Amesim
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
NI Multisim
NI Multisim
Add NI Multisim
COMSOL Multiphysics®
COMSOL Multiphysics®
Add COMSOL Multiphysics®
Discussions
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Simulink
Simulink Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Simulink has no discussions with answers