Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Phabricator 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(835)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabPhabricator
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhabricatorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Phabricator excels in its Configuration Management with a score of 8.7, allowing for detailed control over project configurations, while GitLab's score of 8.8 indicates a strong performance but with slightly less flexibility in complex setups.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Ease of Setup is significantly better, scoring 8.6 compared to Phabricator's 6.3, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly.
- G2 users highlight Phabricator's Task Management capabilities, scoring 8.8, which provides robust tools for tracking and managing tasks, whereas GitLab's score of 8.4 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab shines in Test Automation, achieving a score of 9.1, which is higher than Phabricator's 9.0, indicating a more advanced feature set for automating testing processes.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Integration capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, making it easier to connect with other tools, while Phabricator's score of 8.6 suggests it may have fewer integration options available.
- Users say that both products perform well in Reporting and Analytics, with Phabricator scoring 8.8 and GitLab at 8.3, but Phabricator is noted for providing more detailed insights into project performance.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Axify
(6)
Continuous Integration
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(51)
Continuous Integration
Visit Website
Sponsored
Codemagic
(13)
Continuous Integration
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availablePhabricator
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Phabricator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
625
8.5
27
Ease of Use
8.7
627
8.4
27
Ease of Setup
8.5
187
6.3
15
Ease of Admin
8.6
166
8.2
14
Quality of Support
8.5
492
8.1
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
141
8.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
593
8.7
27
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
117
Not enough data
8.9
125
Not enough data
8.6
117
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.5
104
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.6
98
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
126
Not enough data
9.0
115
Not enough data
8.7
115
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
24
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Administration
8.8
74
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.7
72
Not enough data
8.9
77
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
76
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
9.0
76
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
IT Management
8.6
71
Not enough data
8.8
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
197
Not enough data
8.9
197
Not enough data
8.7
190
Not enough data
Management
8.7
184
Not enough data
8.4
177
Not enough data
8.9
190
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
124
Not enough data
8.5
118
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
123
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
8.8
123
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
62
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
61
Not enough data
8.9
61
Not enough data
8.9
58
Not enough data
Management
8.8
129
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.5
122
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.7
126
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
138
Not enough data
8.5
127
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
207
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
194
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
189
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
197
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
200
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
182
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
110
Not enough data
8.6
106
Not enough data
8.4
107
Not enough data
Security
7.9
95
Not enough data
8.4
95
Not enough data
8.9
104
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Phabricator are categorized as Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Bug Tracking, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Continuous Delivery, and AI Code Generation
Phabricator has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Phabricator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
23.6%
Internet
4.0%
Financial Services
3.5%
Computer & Network Security
2.3%
Other
32.9%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Internet
18.5%
Retail
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.5%
Most Helpful Reviews
GitLab
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Kyle J.
Verified User in Computer Software
UI is a bit clunky for users, to many clicks for simple tasks. Mattermost is the choice integrated chat, I would rather have slack.
Phabricator
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Using it for efficient management of code by quick review, ability to tag people. Good interface, simple installation. It is a brilliant platform to facilitate code review.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Shereef M.
Verified User in Computer Software
set up takes ages and is too difficult to set up
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Using it for efficient management of code by quick review, ability to tag people. Good interface, simple installation. It is a brilliant platform to facilitate code review.
Kyle J.
Verified User in Computer Software
UI is a bit clunky for users, to many clicks for simple tasks. Mattermost is the choice integrated chat, I would rather have slack.
Shereef M.
Verified User in Computer Software
set up takes ages and is too difficult to set up
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Phabricator has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
