Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Git and OpenText AccuRev 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Git
Star Rating
(488)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GitOpenText AccuRev
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText AccuRevSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText AccuRev's "streaming" feature allows for efficient handling of large codebases, but reviewers mention that its user interface can be less intuitive compared to Git's more streamlined design.
- Reviewers say that Git excels in "branching" capabilities, making it easier for teams to work on multiple features simultaneously, while users on G2 note that AccuRev's "branching" is less flexible and can lead to complications in larger projects.
- G2 users highlight that Git's "merge" functionality is robust and well-documented, which contributes to a smoother workflow, whereas users report that AccuRev's "merge" process can be cumbersome and less user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that Git's integration with various CI/CD tools is a significant advantage, providing seamless automation, while users say that AccuRev's integration options are more limited, which can hinder development speed.
- Users on G2 appreciate Git's strong community support and extensive resources available for troubleshooting, while reviewers say that AccuRev's support, although decent, does not match the breadth and responsiveness of Git's community.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText AccuRev's "time-based" versioning is beneficial for enterprise-level projects, but users report that Git's "commit history" feature is more transparent and easier to navigate for everyday use.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Git
No pricing availableOpenText AccuRev
No pricing availableFree Trial
Git
No trial information availableOpenText AccuRev
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
420
8.1
20
Ease of Use
8.1
421
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
8.8
88
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
66
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
336
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
51
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
409
5.3
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Git and OpenText AccuRev are categorized as Version Control Software
Unique Categories
Git has no unique categories
OpenText AccuRev is categorized as Configuration Management and Version Control Clients
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Git
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText AccuRev
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Internet
9.2%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Education Management
2.9%
Other
30.3%
Semiconductors
40.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Computer Hardware
10.0%
Higher Education
5.0%
Other
20.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Git
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vasundhara G.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
The way they structure and record each code
Most Helpful Critical Review
Andrei D.
Verified User in Internet
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
OpenText AccuRev
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Yiwei W.
Verified User in Semiconductors
The UI is very user-friendly. Syncing and committing speed is fast compared to other similar products.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Building Materials
I really do not like the interface, maybe that is the best that can be done, but it seems clunky, and often the wording on the options is confusing.
Vasundhara G.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
The way they structure and record each code
Yiwei W.
Verified User in Semiconductors
The UI is very user-friendly. Syncing and committing speed is fast compared to other similar products.
Andrei D.
Verified User in Internet
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
Verified User in Building Materials
I really do not like the interface, maybe that is the best that can be done, but it seems clunky, and often the wording on the options is confusing.
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Git used for?
3 comments
TG
Version Control of your codebase and repositories.Read more
what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience
2 comments
CA
The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. Read more
The text provided does not contain recognizable words or phrases in any known language, and therefore cannot be translated into English.
1 comment
N
Negative feedbackRead more
OpenText AccuRev has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
