Compare Framework 7 and jQuery Mobile 
- Users report that Framework 7 excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, while jQuery Mobile trails behind at 8.4. Reviewers mention that Framework 7's intuitive interface allows for quicker onboarding and a smoother development experience.
- Reviewers say that Framework 7's performance is notably strong, with a power rating of 8.8, compared to jQuery Mobile's 7.8. Users highlight that Framework 7's lightweight nature contributes to faster load times and better responsiveness in mobile applications.
- G2 users mention that Framework 7 offers superior language support with a score of 8.5, which is crucial for developers working on international projects. In contrast, jQuery Mobile's language support is less robust, leading to challenges in localization.
- Users on G2 report that Framework 7's documentation is rated at 8.3, providing comprehensive guides and examples, while jQuery Mobile's documentation is perceived as less thorough, impacting the learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Framework 7 has a strong community support score of 7.4, which is beneficial for troubleshooting and sharing best practices. In comparison, jQuery Mobile's community engagement is lower, making it harder for users to find help when needed.
- Users say that Framework 7's product direction is highly rated at 9.6, indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features. Conversely, jQuery Mobile's product direction score of 3.9 raises concerns about its long-term viability and support.
Simplicity and documentation of this framework are awesome compared to competitor (aka. Ionic.) The best thing is that you can use whatever JS framework, especially Vanilla.js :) and the whole product is clean, fast, light and comes naturally in my design...
Not as well documented as other platforms like Flutter or Ionic. Not as modern as them either.
The documentation is great, the project is constantly under maintenance. Implementing jQuery mobile, is really easy.
It was a good solution at its time, nowadays there are other needs and approaches. The project is practically abandoned, it checked out its GitHub repo, their last commit was in 2019 (today's 01-2021). It doesn't support MVC framework. There are new and...
Simplicity and documentation of this framework are awesome compared to competitor (aka. Ionic.) The best thing is that you can use whatever JS framework, especially Vanilla.js :) and the whole product is clean, fast, light and comes naturally in my design...
The documentation is great, the project is constantly under maintenance. Implementing jQuery mobile, is really easy.
Not as well documented as other platforms like Flutter or Ionic. Not as modern as them either.
It was a good solution at its time, nowadays there are other needs and approaches. The project is practically abandoned, it checked out its GitHub repo, their last commit was in 2019 (today's 01-2021). It doesn't support MVC framework. There are new and...
