Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flutter and python wiki 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flutter
Star Rating
(65)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (71.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Flutterpython wiki
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about python wikiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that while both "python wiki" and "Flutter" have high ease of use ratings (9.2), "Flutter" excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for a quick start.
- Reviewers mention that "python wiki" has a superior component library rating of 9.6, which is particularly beneficial for users needing a wide range of pre-built components, while "Flutter" scores 8.9, indicating a smaller selection.
- G2 users highlight that "Flutter" offers better unlocked components (9.0) compared to "python wiki" (8.1), allowing for more customization and flexibility in app development.
- Users on G2 report that "python wiki" has a strong framework integration score of 9.2, which is crucial for those looking to integrate with existing systems, while "Flutter" slightly edges out with a score of 9.4.
- Reviewers mention that "python wiki" has a higher quality of support rating (9.1) compared to "Flutter" (8.5), indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise.
- Users say that "Flutter" has a more positive product direction score of 9.7, suggesting that it is actively evolving and improving, which is a significant factor for long-term users looking for ongoing enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flutter
No pricing availablepython wiki
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flutter
No trial information availablepython wiki
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
44
9.3
10
Ease of Use
9.2
44
9.2
10
Ease of Setup
9.7
10
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
10
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
42
9.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
10
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
41
8.8
10
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
26
8.1
8
8.9
27
9.6
8
9.0
26
8.1
8
Management
9.4
27
9.2
8
8.8
24
9.3
7
8.8
24
8.5
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Flutter and python wiki are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Flutter has no unique categories
python wiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flutter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
python wiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Computer Software
31.7%
Program Development
5.0%
Education Management
5.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
3.3%
Other
21.7%
Internet
15.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Consulting
7.7%
Writing and Editing
7.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Flutter
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Akshay P.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Flutter provides cross-platform developement. Easy to use. Large & growing community.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Parth A.
Verified User in Education Management
The first thing which disappointed me was the app which made using flutter was taking so much of space even though it was containing less codes. Also , I switched from this platform due to less features available.
python wiki
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Insurance
All the required and necessary information in one place. Well structured and formatted, and indexed.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Akshay P.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Flutter provides cross-platform developement. Easy to use. Large & growing community.
Verified User in Insurance
All the required and necessary information in one place. Well structured and formatted, and indexed.
Parth A.
Verified User in Education Management
The first thing which disappointed me was the app which made using flutter was taking so much of space even though it was containing less codes. Also , I switched from this platform due to less features available.
Alternatives
Discussions
Flutter has no discussions with answers
python wiki has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
