Compare Firebird and SQLite 
- Users report that SQLite excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick implementation, while Firebird, with a score of 9.5, is noted for its slightly better ease of administration, which can be crucial for ongoing management.
- Reviewers mention that Firebird shines in its query language capabilities, scoring 9.0 compared to SQLite's 8.8, indicating that users find Firebird's SQL features more robust and flexible for complex queries.
- G2 users highlight that SQLite has a strong performance in data manipulation with a score of 8.0, but Firebird outperforms it with a score of 9.1, suggesting that users find Firebird's data handling more efficient and effective for their needs.
- Users on G2 report that Firebird offers superior encryption features, scoring 9.4, which is significantly higher than SQLite's 7.6, indicating a stronger focus on security for sensitive data management.
- Reviewers say that while both products have similar disaster recovery capabilities, SQLite scores slightly higher at 7.9 compared to Firebird's 7.7, suggesting that users may find SQLite's recovery options more reliable in critical situations.
- Users mention that Firebird's overall stability is rated higher at 8.8 compared to SQLite's 8.3, which can be a deciding factor for businesses that prioritize consistent performance and uptime in their database solutions.
The fact that the entire database is portable as a single file made migrating content from one system to another easy and fool-proof.
Multi-User capability I think was a weakness. Although it supports this feature, it tended not to work very well in my opinion.
Ease of use, free, simple to install, less hassle when starting web development on local machine as it allows for skipping some of the dependencies required for more professional sql database solutions.
Not all data types and joins are supported. Sometimes referential integrity is compromised when multiple users are making changes.
The fact that the entire database is portable as a single file made migrating content from one system to another easy and fool-proof.
Ease of use, free, simple to install, less hassle when starting web development on local machine as it allows for skipping some of the dependencies required for more professional sql database solutions.
Multi-User capability I think was a weakness. Although it supports this feature, it tended not to work very well in my opinion.
Not all data types and joins are supported. Sometimes referential integrity is compromised when multiple users are making changes.
