- Home
- ...
- Load Balancing Software
- F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
- HAProxy
- F5 NGINX Ingress Controller-vs-HAProxy
Compare F5 NGINX Ingress Controller and HAProxy 
- Users report that HAProxy excels in performance and reliability, achieving a score of 9.6, which is higher than F5 NGINX Ingress Controller's performance rating. Reviewers mention that HAProxy's ability to handle high traffic loads efficiently is a significant advantage for businesses with demanding workloads.
- Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller offers superior ease of use, with a score of 9.1 compared to HAProxy's 8.7. Users on G2 appreciate the intuitive interface and straightforward setup process, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for quick deployment.
- G2 users highlight HAProxy's strong API integrations, scoring 9.1, which allows for seamless connectivity with various applications. Users say that this feature is crucial for organizations that rely on multiple tools and need a cohesive ecosystem.
- Users report that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller shines in quality of support, with a score of 9.3, compared to HAProxy's 9.0. Reviewers mention that the responsive customer service and extensive documentation provided by F5 make troubleshooting and implementation smoother.
- Reviewers mention that HAProxy's logging and reporting capabilities are robust, scoring 8.7, which is essential for monitoring and analyzing traffic patterns. Users say that this feature helps in proactive issue resolution and performance optimization.
- Users on G2 report that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller has a slight edge in security monitoring, with a score of 8.5 compared to HAProxy's 8.2. Reviewers mention that the advanced security features offered by F5 provide peace of mind for businesses concerned about data protection.
it is easy to implemnt and control traffic based on use case and port like 443 (hhtps ) and http (80 ) and it support custom TCP port also . you can use nginx ingress controller on VM (IAAS ) based server and kuberneties (PAAS ) based servie also .
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
The HAPEE version combines a productive load balancer with excellent built-in software WAF and mod_security., as well as protection from DOS attacks, protection from bots, a module for google recaptcha. It was the built-in security system that first...
No UDP support, hence we faced challenges with device traffic load balancing
it is easy to implemnt and control traffic based on use case and port like 443 (hhtps ) and http (80 ) and it support custom TCP port also . you can use nginx ingress controller on VM (IAAS ) based server and kuberneties (PAAS ) based servie also .
The HAPEE version combines a productive load balancer with excellent built-in software WAF and mod_security., as well as protection from DOS attacks, protection from bots, a module for google recaptcha. It was the built-in security system that first...
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
No UDP support, hence we faced challenges with device traffic load balancing
