Compare DeepSource and SonarQube 
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in "Static Code Analysis" with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into code quality, while DeepSource, although strong, has a slightly lower focus on this area.
- Reviewers mention that DeepSource shines in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.3, making it more accessible for small businesses, whereas SonarQube Server has a lower score of 8.3, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that SonarQube Server's "Documentation" is rated at 7.7, which some find lacking in clarity, while DeepSource's documentation is perceived as more user-friendly, contributing to its higher overall satisfaction ratings.
- Users on G2 report that DeepSource offers superior "Quality of Support" with a score of 9.5, which is significantly higher than SonarQube Server's 8.0, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube Server has robust "Repository Integration" capabilities with a score of 7.8, which is essential for enterprise-level users, while DeepSource's integration features are tailored more towards small businesses, reflecting its target market.
- Users say that SonarQube Server's "Product Direction" score of 8.0 suggests a strong commitment to evolving the product, while DeepSource's lower score of 7.1 raises concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
- All features in Free
- Access to all analyzers
- Unlimited private repositories
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
I got to find them out by GitHub, and they are fantastic. I used it for my project for a while on the essential plan. They have auto-fix options where you can automatically make a pull request via a button for the fix, detail what needs to be fixed and...
The app is easy to integrate with the repository, but one has to regularly check the performance risks and issues in the code on their platform. The process is not too time-consuming, but an automated system would be appreciated in future releases.
What I love about SonarQube is how it digs deep into my code and finds hidden issues which are not as obvious when writing the code, especially bugs and security problems, across different programming languages. It hooks up smoothly with my CI/CD pipelines,...
no real support whatsoever for the $20k price tag; set up can be hellish if you haven't been through it before. With a database that has prevented updates to newer versions
I got to find them out by GitHub, and they are fantastic. I used it for my project for a while on the essential plan. They have auto-fix options where you can automatically make a pull request via a button for the fix, detail what needs to be fixed and...
What I love about SonarQube is how it digs deep into my code and finds hidden issues which are not as obvious when writing the code, especially bugs and security problems, across different programming languages. It hooks up smoothly with my CI/CD pipelines,...
The app is easy to integrate with the repository, but one has to regularly check the performance risks and issues in the code on their platform. The process is not too time-consuming, but an automated system would be appreciated in future releases.
no real support whatsoever for the $20k price tag; set up can be hellish if you haven't been through it before. With a database that has prevented updates to newer versions
