Compare CruiseControl and Jenkins 
- Users report that Jenkins excels in its integration capabilities, with a G2 rating of 9.2, allowing seamless connections with various tools and services, while CruiseControl, with a lower rating of 7.5, struggles to match this level of extensibility.
- Reviewers mention that Jenkins offers superior automation features, scoring 9.3, which significantly enhances the continuous integration and deployment processes, whereas CruiseControl's automation capabilities are rated at 8.4, indicating room for improvement.
- G2 users highlight Jenkins' robust pipeline control and workflow visualization features, rated at 8.9 and 8.7 respectively, which provide clear insights into the development process, while CruiseControl's ratings in these areas are notably lower, suggesting less effective management of workflows.
- Users on G2 appreciate Jenkins for its configuration management and access control, both rated above 8.8, which are crucial for maintaining security and organization in enterprise environments, contrasting with CruiseControl's lower scores in these functionalities.
- Reviewers say that Jenkins has a more user-friendly setup experience, with a score of 7.8, compared to CruiseControl's 6.7, making it a more appealing choice for teams looking to implement CI/CD pipelines quickly.
- Users report that Jenkins has a better overall support experience, with a quality of support rating of 7.8, while CruiseControl's support is rated at 6.9, indicating that Jenkins may provide more reliable assistance when issues arise.
Configurations are best, easy to integrate with other plugins
I really dislike the use usage of XML to configure it. Sometime the config file can get really convoluted if you just add more and more projects in the same XML file. Even if there is a GUI tool and a schema checker I think that YAML or JSON would be a...
This is a powerful tool out of the box. Several VCS are natively supported, including SVN and git, both of which I use regularly. The ability to monitor branches for changes enables true continuous automation. Excellent Maven and Java support overall makes...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
Configurations are best, easy to integrate with other plugins
This is a powerful tool out of the box. Several VCS are natively supported, including SVN and git, both of which I use regularly. The ability to monitor branches for changes enables true continuous automation. Excellent Maven and Java support overall makes...
I really dislike the use usage of XML to configure it. Sometime the config file can get really convoluted if you just add more and more projects in the same XML file. Even if there is a GUI tool and a schema checker I think that YAML or JSON would be a...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
