Compare Civil 3D and MicroStation 
- Users report that Civil 3D excels in "Earthwork" with a score of 9.1, highlighting its robust capabilities in calculating earthwork quantities, which is crucial for grading and site development projects. In contrast, MicroStation's score of 8.3 in the same area indicates it may not be as strong in this specific functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Civil 3D's "Dynamic Updating" feature, rated at 8.8, allows for real-time changes in design, which significantly enhances workflow efficiency. MicroStation, while also strong with a score of 8.7, does not provide the same level of immediacy in updates, which can affect project timelines.
- G2 users highlight that Civil 3D's "File Import/Export" capabilities are rated at 9.1, making it easier to collaborate with other software and share files seamlessly. MicroStation's score of 8.4 suggests it may have some limitations in this area, potentially complicating collaboration with external teams.
- Users on G2 report that Civil 3D's "Drawing" functionality is rated at 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for creating detailed civil engineering drawings. MicroStation, with a score of 9.1, is also strong but may not offer the same level of specialized tools for civil projects.
- Reviewers mention that MicroStation shines in "Transportation engineering" with a score of 9.0, indicating its strength in road and highway design. Civil 3D, with a score of 8.2, may not provide the same depth of features tailored specifically for transportation projects.
- Users say that Civil 3D's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.4, which some find lacking compared to MicroStation's score of 7.6. This difference suggests that users may experience better support and resources when using MicroStation, which can be critical for resolving issues quickly during project execution.
- Access to the latest version
- Use software anywhere
- Access previous versions
- Training via Virtuosity Keys
- Flexible for your project needs
- Named-User license
Easy to use and helpful assistance menus, as well as helpful online communities and forums.
Most of big companies are using it on the cloud and Civil3D is not design for the cloud. It need to be changed. In addition, AutoCAD Help is so not get to the point. For example, Google search is more easier than searching help in AutoCAD Help. It is...
I think MicroStation is the best software for Civil and Rail technicians, designers and engineers in the world. You do not need any special course to start. I think with help from more experienced users is fully-sufficient. In each company where I worked...
The user interface definitely needs to be adjusted. Don't get me wrong, the old Microstation was much worse but some more tweeks need to be made. They need to update more often too, not like the AutoCAD every year update but the time span between updates...
Easy to use and helpful assistance menus, as well as helpful online communities and forums.
I think MicroStation is the best software for Civil and Rail technicians, designers and engineers in the world. You do not need any special course to start. I think with help from more experienced users is fully-sufficient. In each company where I worked...
Most of big companies are using it on the cloud and Civil3D is not design for the cloud. It need to be changed. In addition, AutoCAD Help is so not get to the point. For example, Google search is more easier than searching help in AutoCAD Help. It is...
The user interface definitely needs to be adjusted. Don't get me wrong, the old Microstation was much worse but some more tweeks need to be made. They need to update more often too, not like the AutoCAD every year update but the time span between updates...
