Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Tenable Vulnerability Management

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Star Rating
(217)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(110)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (57.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tenable Vulnerability Management
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Cisco Vulnerability Management excels in risk scoring with a rating of 9.0, which reviewers mention provides a comprehensive view of vulnerabilities, allowing teams to prioritize effectively. In contrast, Tenable Vulnerability Management has a slightly lower risk scoring rating of 8.8, which some users feel may not offer the same depth in prioritization.
  • Reviewers mention that Cisco's automated scans are highly rated at 9.2, with users appreciating the efficiency and thoroughness of the scanning process. On the other hand, Tenable's vulnerability scanning is rated even higher at 9.3, with users noting its effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities across various environments.
  • G2 users highlight that Cisco Vulnerability Management has a strong quality of support rating at 8.7, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Tenable's support rating is lower at 7.9, with some users expressing concerns about response times and the depth of support provided.
  • Users on G2 report that Cisco's risk prioritization feature shines with a rating of 9.1, allowing teams to focus on the most critical vulnerabilities first. In comparison, Tenable's risk prioritization is rated at 8.8, which some users feel lacks the same level of granularity in prioritizing risks.
  • Reviewers mention that Cisco's ease of use is rated at 8.5, with many finding the interface intuitive and user-friendly. However, Tenable scores higher at 8.9, with users praising its streamlined navigation and overall user experience.
  • Users say that Cisco's vulnerability intelligence feature is rated at 8.7, providing valuable insights into vulnerabilities. In contrast, Tenable's vulnerability intelligence is rated higher at 9.1, with reviewers noting its extensive database and timely updates that enhance threat awareness.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
No pricing available
Tenable Vulnerability Management
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Free Trial is available
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
158
8.8
71
Ease of Use
8.5
161
8.9
73
Ease of Setup
8.4
73
8.7
57
Ease of Admin
8.4
75
8.7
56
Quality of Support
8.7
137
7.9
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
74
8.5
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
150
8.7
74
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.4
45
Performance
Not enough data
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.1
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
42
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
8.6
38
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
37
Not enough data
8.8
34
|
Verified
Application
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.2
143
8.5
57
Risk Analysis
9.0
128
8.8
48
8.5
127
8.3
49
9.1
124
8.8
48
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
118
9.3
49
8.7
126
9.1
47
8.3
126
8.6
44
8.5
126
8.3
47
Automation
7.3
92
7.9
39
7.5
91
8.1
37
7.7
94
8.2
41
7.6
87
8.2
42
ServiceNow Store AppsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.5
8
ServiceNow Apps
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Tenable Vulnerability Management are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) has no unique categories
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and ServiceNow Store Apps
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
6.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
76.5%
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
57.0%
Reviewers' Industry
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Information Technology and Services
22.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Other
44.0%
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Information Technology and Services
14.0%
Financial Services
13.0%
Computer & Network Security
9.0%
Banking
7.0%
Computer Software
6.0%
Other
51.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Ease of use. The dashboard is clear and easy to understand.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Automotive

I dislike the remediation steps. Yes, I could log on to individual agents and upgrade packages but generally updating to a new image would be a better remediation step.

Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Completeness of features and easy to use interface.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Mining & Metals

I dislike the huge number of bugs and malfunction that makes the product not fully usable in our infra

Alternatives
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Alternatives
InsightVM (Nexpose)
InsightVM (Nexpose)
Add InsightVM (Nexpose)
Nucleus
Nucleus
Add Nucleus
Brinqa
Brinqa
Add Brinqa
Qualys VMDR
Qualys VMDR
Add Qualys VMDR
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management Alternatives
InsightVM (Nexpose)
InsightVM (Nexpose)
Add InsightVM (Nexpose)
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne
Add SentinelOne Singularity
Intruder
Intruder
Add Intruder
Discussions
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Discussions
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management Discussions
Please advice on best practices for utilizing API to tie to visualization dashboards such as Power BI, Qlick, or Tableau
1 comment
Verified User
G2
What is tenable io?
1 comment
CK
Tenable.io is user-friendly front end for Nessus scanners that provides a digestible view of all of the data the scanner is picking up. It allows you to...Read more
What is Tenable.io used for?
1 comment
DH
vulnerability and security management.Read more