When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Tenable Nessus easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) overall.
Ease of use. The dashboard is clear and easy to understand.
I dislike the remediation steps. Yes, I could log on to individual agents and upgrade packages but generally updating to a new image would be a better remediation step.
Ease of use, simple reports, quick to setup, quick scanning, no training required for use.
Nessus generates a large amount of false positives, particularly on Linux systems for applications like Apache, Tomcat, etc. It generally only reads the banners, and even if you run an authenticated scan, it often times does not detect patches that are...
Ease of use. The dashboard is clear and easy to understand.
Ease of use, simple reports, quick to setup, quick scanning, no training required for use.
I dislike the remediation steps. Yes, I could log on to individual agents and upgrade packages but generally updating to a new image would be a better remediation step.
Nessus generates a large amount of false positives, particularly on Linux systems for applications like Apache, Tomcat, etc. It generally only reads the banners, and even if you run an authenticated scan, it often times does not detect patches that are...