Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Star Rating
(217)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Nucleus
Nucleus
Star Rating
(30)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.2% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Application / Device
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Nucleus
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Reviews say that Cisco Vulnerability Management excels in risk scoring with a rating of 9.0, which users appreciate for its ability to prioritize vulnerabilities effectively, while Nucleus follows closely with a score of 8.8, indicating a strong but slightly less robust risk assessment capability.
  • Users report that Nucleus shines in vulnerability intelligence, achieving a score of 9.1, which reviewers mention helps them stay ahead of emerging threats, whereas Cisco Vulnerability Management has a solid score of 8.7, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in threat intelligence.
  • Reviewers mention that Nucleus offers superior automated remediation features, scoring 8.8, which users find particularly beneficial for streamlining their security processes, while Cisco Vulnerability Management's score of 7.3 indicates room for improvement in this area.
  • Users on G2 highlight that Cisco Vulnerability Management provides a more user-friendly experience with an ease of use score of 8.5, compared to Nucleus's 8.8, suggesting that while both are user-friendly, Nucleus may have a slight edge in overall usability.
  • G2 users report that Nucleus's workflow automation capabilities are rated highly at 8.9, which reviewers say significantly enhances their operational efficiency, while Cisco Vulnerability Management's score of 7.5 indicates it may not offer the same level of automation in workflows.
  • Users say that both products have comparable quality of support, each scoring 8.7, but reviewers mention that Cisco Vulnerability Management has a slight advantage in being a good partner in business, with a score of 8.9, indicating strong customer relationships.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
No pricing available
Nucleus
Nucleus Security
Contact Us
1 Application / Device
Learn more about Nucleus
Free Trial
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Free Trial is available
Nucleus
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
158
8.3
22
Ease of Use
8.5
161
8.8
23
Ease of Setup
8.4
73
8.2
12
Ease of Admin
8.4
75
8.3
13
Quality of Support
8.7
137
8.7
22
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
74
8.9
12
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
150
9.3
16
Features by Category
Risk-Based Vulnerability ManagementHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.2
143
8.6
14
Risk Analysis
9.0
128
8.8
13
8.5
127
8.3
13
9.1
124
9.0
13
Vulnerability Assesment
8.4
118
8.9
11
8.7
126
9.1
13
8.3
126
8.5
13
8.5
126
8.3
13
Automation
7.3
92
8.8
10
7.5
91
8.9
11
7.7
94
8.1
9
7.6
87
8.1
7
ServiceNow Store AppsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
ServiceNow Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Exposure Management PlatformsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Nucleus
Nucleus
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
6.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
76.5%
Nucleus
Nucleus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
6.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
55.2%
Reviewers' Industry
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Information Technology and Services
22.0%
Financial Services
12.0%
Retail
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Computer Software
6.5%
Other
44.0%
Nucleus
Nucleus
Computer & Network Security
31.0%
Airlines/Aviation
31.0%
Financial Services
10.3%
Computer Software
6.9%
Aviation & Aerospace
6.9%
Other
13.8%
Most Helpful Reviews
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

I like the ease of use and messaging around how the tool just works. I did not no much about it until working on a project with a customer who was interested in learning more. Unfortunately, that deal did not cross the finish line, as the budget was lost in...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Financial Services

Asset tagging system. Sometimes a system gets lost in the information that's being imported.

Nucleus
Nucleus
Most Helpful Favorable Review
AS
Amber S.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Makes vulnerability triage quick and painless

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Computer & Network Security

It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....

Alternatives
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Alternatives
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Add Tenable Vulnerability Management
InsightVM (Nexpose)
InsightVM (Nexpose)
Add InsightVM (Nexpose)
Brinqa
Brinqa
Add Brinqa
Qualys VMDR
Qualys VMDR
Add Qualys VMDR
Nucleus
Nucleus Alternatives
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM
Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM
Add Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM
CloudBees
CloudBees
Add CloudBees
Arctic Wolf
Arctic Wolf
Add Arctic Wolf
Discussions
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Discussions
What is the best way to onboard new user/hire to leverage the Kenna tool to its fullest ?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
Andy - thanks for reaching out with this question. Customers have the option to engage with the Kenna CX team and related resources. We have developed an...Read more
Is there a way to sort by most recently changed asset scores?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
"Hi Matt. You are correct. You cannot sort directly on the last time that an asset score changed, but remember that Kenna is designed to pull you out of the...Read more
Training - is there training that I can take to be more efficient with this tool?
1 comment
Stacy M.
SM
Joe - Excellent question. Customers have the option to engage with their assigned CX team, and for those customers who have elected to have a lower touch...Read more
Nucleus
Nucleus Discussions
To retain your preferences, ensure that you save your settings in the application or system you are using. Look for options like 'Save Settings' or 'Apply Changes' to make sure your preferences are stored. Additionally, check if there is an option to create a user profile or account, as this can help in retaining your preferences across different sessions or devices.
1 comment
Adam D.
AD
Hello Pradeep! The capability to retain preferences is on our roadmap and has been prioritized, as it is a request from multiple large-enterprise customers.Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Nucleus has no more discussions with answers