Compare Cisco Meraki and Juniper Firewall 
- Users report that Juniper Firewall excels in its "Firewall" capabilities, receiving a high score of 9.1, which indicates robust security features. In contrast, Cisco Meraki also performs well in this area but has a slightly lower score, suggesting that while it is effective, it may not offer the same level of depth in firewall functionalities.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco Meraki shines in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for organizations looking for a quick deployment. Juniper Firewall, while still competent with a score of 8.5, may require more time and expertise to configure effectively.
- G2 users highlight the superior "Dashboard" experience in Cisco Meraki, scoring 9.4, which provides intuitive analytics and monitoring tools. Users of Juniper Firewall, with a score of 9.3, appreciate its dashboard but note that it may not be as user-friendly as Meraki's interface.
- Users on G2 report that both products have comparable "Quality of Support" ratings at 8.3, indicating that users feel supported by both vendors. However, some reviewers mention that Juniper Firewall's support can be slower to respond compared to Cisco Meraki's more responsive service.
- Reviewers say that Cisco Meraki's "Integration" capabilities score a remarkable 9.3, allowing for seamless connectivity with other applications and services. In contrast, Juniper Firewall, while still effective, scores slightly lower, suggesting that it may not integrate as effortlessly with third-party tools.
- Users report that Juniper Firewall's "Antivirus" feature scores 8.8, which is commendable, but Cisco Meraki's overall security features, including "Intrusion Prevention" and "Intrusion Detection," both scoring 9.0, provide a more comprehensive security solution that users find reassuring.
The interface is the key to the Meraki solutions, single pane of glass that allows administrators easy access from anywhere to configure, test, and manage Meraki's network solutions. There are plenty of technical articles on deploying these solutions and...
MX appliances are missing some features, they provide DHCP but then don't provide DNS. DNS is fairly standard on perimeter devices and can't think of any competitor that doesn't have it. Support is sub-par and often does not provide you with solutions. ...
I appreciate Juniper Firewall for its robust security features and efficient network protection. The comprehensive threat detection, user-friendly interface, and scalability make it a reliable choice for safeguarding our network infrastructure.
Compared to the competition, juniper is far behind in terms of user friendly and easy to work with making it the least-used firewall in multiple big companies. Its GUI is too outdated with competitions like checkpoint firewall and palo alto firewall
The interface is the key to the Meraki solutions, single pane of glass that allows administrators easy access from anywhere to configure, test, and manage Meraki's network solutions. There are plenty of technical articles on deploying these solutions and...
I appreciate Juniper Firewall for its robust security features and efficient network protection. The comprehensive threat detection, user-friendly interface, and scalability make it a reliable choice for safeguarding our network infrastructure.
MX appliances are missing some features, they provide DHCP but then don't provide DNS. DNS is fairly standard on perimeter devices and can't think of any competitor that doesn't have it. Support is sub-par and often does not provide you with solutions. ...
Compared to the competition, juniper is far behind in terms of user friendly and easy to work with making it the least-used firewall in multiple big companies. Its GUI is too outdated with competitions like checkpoint firewall and palo alto firewall
