Compare Chaos Corona and Redshift 
- Users report that Chaos Corona excels in ease of use, with a score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a user-friendly rendering solution. In contrast, Redshift, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 8.2.
- Reviewers mention that Chaos Corona's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is commendable, but Redshift outshines it with a higher score of 8.6, indicating that users find Redshift's support more responsive and helpful.
- G2 users highlight that Chaos Corona has a strong focus on exterior rendering capabilities, which is particularly beneficial for architectural visualizations. Redshift, however, is noted for its advanced shading and lighting features, making it a favorite for users needing detailed and realistic renderings.
- Users on G2 report that Chaos Corona offers a free trial, allowing potential buyers to test the software before committing, which is a significant advantage for small businesses. Redshift does not have a free trial option, which may deter some users from trying it out.
- Reviewers say that Chaos Corona has a higher percentage of positive feedback regarding product direction (8.7) compared to Redshift (8.4), suggesting that users feel more confident about the future development and updates of Chaos Corona.
- Users report that while both products integrate well with various 3D rendering tools, Chaos Corona is particularly praised for its seamless BIM integration, which is essential for users in the architecture and construction sectors, whereas Redshift is more focused on general 3D rendering integrations.
- Latest Corona version
- Free for 30 days
The software is very robust and without flaws or bugs. Well optimized and regularly updated, it evolves well with market needs. It is easy to handle and the results are always without unpleasant surprises, a highly realistic outcome with the definition and...
Some of bugs (adressed by community) are ignored Price (but too expensive) Lack of GPU features Lack of realtime features Cosmos (library) quality seems to bit low - especially for textures Chaoes licence server is going crazy on Windows (I need...
I like this rendering for speed, the ability to use not only the memory of the graphic card, but also the RAM. This makes it possible to render complex and "heavy" scenes. Also, it is built into Autodesk Maya and SideFX Houdini, which make the shader...
Lacking features such as zero-downtime cloning functionality and proper separation of compute and storage.
The software is very robust and without flaws or bugs. Well optimized and regularly updated, it evolves well with market needs. It is easy to handle and the results are always without unpleasant surprises, a highly realistic outcome with the definition and...
I like this rendering for speed, the ability to use not only the memory of the graphic card, but also the RAM. This makes it possible to render complex and "heavy" scenes. Also, it is built into Autodesk Maya and SideFX Houdini, which make the shader...
Some of bugs (adressed by community) are ignored Price (but too expensive) Lack of GPU features Lack of realtime features Cosmos (library) quality seems to bit low - especially for textures Chaoes licence server is going crazy on Windows (I need...
Lacking features such as zero-downtime cloning functionality and proper separation of compute and storage.
