Compare Chainstack and QuickNode 
- Users report that Chainstack excels in quality of support, with a score of 9.6, while QuickNode's support is rated lower at 8.5. Reviewers mention that Chainstack's team is responsive and helpful, making it a reliable partner for businesses.
- Reviewers say that Chainstack offers better cost control features, scoring 9.0 compared to QuickNode's 7.2. Users on G2 highlight Chainstack's transparent pricing model, which helps small businesses manage their budgets effectively.
- Users say that Chainstack shines in scalability with a score of 9.0, while QuickNode follows with 8.6. Reviewers mention that Chainstack's infrastructure allows for seamless scaling as business needs grow, making it ideal for expanding projects.
- G2 users report that Chainstack's smart contract functionality is rated at 8.7, outperforming QuickNode's 8.1. Users mention that Chainstack provides robust tools for developing and deploying smart contracts, which is crucial for blockchain applications.
- Reviewers mention that QuickNode has a slight edge in ease of setup, scoring 9.1 compared to Chainstack's unlisted score. Users appreciate QuickNode's straightforward onboarding process, which allows for quick deployment of blockchain nodes.
- Users on G2 highlight that Chainstack's product direction is rated at a perfect 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development, while QuickNode's score of 9.4 is still commendable. Reviewers say this reflects Chainstack's commitment to innovation and user feedback.
- 3,000,000 request units
- 25 RPS
- Access to 25+ chains
- 15 Requests per second
- 1 Endpoint
- 5 GB for Streams
The support is really good and you can directly discuss issues with the CTO via Telegram which is a great plus.
Unlike some other similar platforms i have interacted with, Quicknodes user interface is so user friendly that it makes navigation so seamless and stress free. Their customer support is timely as well.
The hosting services for applications are inconvenient they could present difficulties when it comes to building and maintaining infrastructure. It complicates things for developers relying on QuickNode, for infrastructure management limit flexibility and...
The support is really good and you can directly discuss issues with the CTO via Telegram which is a great plus.
Unlike some other similar platforms i have interacted with, Quicknodes user interface is so user friendly that it makes navigation so seamless and stress free. Their customer support is timely as well.
The hosting services for applications are inconvenient they could present difficulties when it comes to building and maintaining infrastructure. It complicates things for developers relying on QuickNode, for infrastructure management limit flexibility and...
