We primarily use CData for EDI integration. It makes the effort seamless compared to writing the integration ourselves.
Don't really have much cons. Overall software geared towards a more technical user. Although they are improving there UI often to make it more user friendly, some of the more advance stuff ends up requiring custom coding or working with support.
Mule ESB comes out of the box with a great suite of enterprise-level connectors, allowing quick, no-hassle wire-ups of standards-based processes. If your solutions are more custom, Mule is Spring-backed, meaning wiring up custom protocols is almost as easy...
Comprehensive Documentation which helps us getting started up with the pre-requisite and configurations is missing.
We primarily use CData for EDI integration. It makes the effort seamless compared to writing the integration ourselves.
Mule ESB comes out of the box with a great suite of enterprise-level connectors, allowing quick, no-hassle wire-ups of standards-based processes. If your solutions are more custom, Mule is Spring-backed, meaning wiring up custom protocols is almost as easy...
Don't really have much cons. Overall software geared towards a more technical user. Although they are improving there UI often to make it more user friendly, some of the more advance stuff ends up requiring custom coding or working with support.
Comprehensive Documentation which helps us getting started up with the pre-requisite and configurations is missing.