Compare Buildkite and Jenkins 
- Users report that Jenkins excels in its extensive integration capabilities, with a rating of 9.2, allowing seamless connections with a wide range of tools and services, while Buildkite, despite its strong integration rating of 9.8, is noted for fewer available integrations overall.
- Reviewers mention that Buildkite shines in ease of use, scoring 9.3 compared to Jenkins' 8.0, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to streamline their CI/CD processes.
- G2 users highlight Jenkins' robust automation features, achieving a high score of 9.3, which allows for complex workflows and customizations, whereas Buildkite's automation features, while solid at 8.8, may not offer the same level of depth.
- Users on G2 indicate that Buildkite's quality of support is exceptional, with a score of 9.5, significantly higher than Jenkins' 7.8, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support with Buildkite.
- Reviewers say that Jenkins provides strong pipeline control with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for managing complex deployment processes, while Buildkite's pipeline control features are rated lower, indicating potential limitations in managing intricate workflows.
- Users report that Jenkins has a more extensive community and resource availability, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and learning, while Buildkite, despite its higher overall ratings, may not have the same level of community support.
- Unlimited concurrency
- Unlimited pipelines
- 5,000 job minutes/month
Better integration with Github, Can configure multiple versions and users easily for greater productivity. This solution is very cost-effective compared to other expensive GitHub integration software, and was moreover very well received by the user...
I have been using Jenkins since a year now. It is very helpful for the organization as it helps to monitor the activities and the bugs on day basis. It also helps the whole organization to know what is going around in the team and the percentage of Fails -...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
Better integration with Github, Can configure multiple versions and users easily for greater productivity. This solution is very cost-effective compared to other expensive GitHub integration software, and was moreover very well received by the user...
I have been using Jenkins since a year now. It is very helpful for the organization as it helps to monitor the activities and the bugs on day basis. It also helps the whole organization to know what is going around in the team and the percentage of Fails -...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
