Compare Buddy and Jenkins 
- Users report that Jenkins has a robust integration capability with a rating of 9.2, but Buddy shines even brighter with a 9.5, making it easier for teams to connect with various tools and services seamlessly.
- Reviewers mention that Jenkins offers good extensibility at 8.9, but Buddy matches this score while also providing a more user-friendly interface, which enhances the overall user experience.
- G2 users highlight that Jenkins has a solid automation feature rated at 9.3, yet Buddy surpasses it with a 9.5, allowing for more streamlined and efficient deployment processes.
- Users on G2 say that Jenkins' configuration management is rated at 8.9, but Buddy excels with a score of 9.4, indicating a more intuitive setup and management process for users.
- Reviewers mention that while Jenkins has a decent pipeline control rating of 8.9, Buddy's 9.4 rating reflects its superior capabilities in managing and visualizing workflows effectively.
- Users report that Jenkins has a quality of support rating of 7.8, which is lower than Buddy's 8.9, suggesting that Buddy provides a more responsive and helpful support experience for its users.
- 1 seat
- 1 runner
- 300 pipeline GB-minutes
- Ease of setup. - Fast and effective support. - Large customizability. - Minimal changes were required past the initial setup.
Limited Open Source support (only 5 repos) so I have decommissioned this on most of my GitHub repos now in favour of other CI systems like GitHub Actions, Travis CI and Azure DevOps which are my top 3 (in that order, I still use a lot of other CI systems...
This is a powerful tool out of the box. Several VCS are natively supported, including SVN and git, both of which I use regularly. The ability to monitor branches for changes enables true continuous automation. Excellent Maven and Java support overall makes...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
- Ease of setup. - Fast and effective support. - Large customizability. - Minimal changes were required past the initial setup.
This is a powerful tool out of the box. Several VCS are natively supported, including SVN and git, both of which I use regularly. The ability to monitor branches for changes enables true continuous automation. Excellent Maven and Java support overall makes...
Limited Open Source support (only 5 repos) so I have decommissioned this on most of my GitHub repos now in favour of other CI systems like GitHub Actions, Travis CI and Azure DevOps which are my top 3 (in that order, I still use a lot of other CI systems...
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
