Compare Bamboo and Octopus Deploy 
- Users report that Bamboo excels in integration capabilities, scoring a remarkable 9.7, which reviewers mention makes it easy to connect with various tools and services, enhancing the overall development workflow.
- Reviewers mention that Octopus Deploy shines in deployment automation, achieving a high score of 9.6, with users praising its ability to streamline complex deployment processes and reduce manual errors.
- G2 users highlight Bamboo's strong configuration management features, scoring 8.5, which allows for effective management of build configurations, while Octopus Deploy's configuration management is less emphasized in user reviews.
- Users on G2 report that Octopus Deploy offers superior error management in automation, with features that allow for better recovery options and runbook procedure updates, which users find crucial for maintaining uptime.
- Reviewers mention that Bamboo's dashboards score an impressive 8.7, providing clear visibility into project status and performance metrics, whereas Octopus Deploy's dashboard capabilities are noted as less intuitive by some users.
- Users say that while both products have strong support, Octopus Deploy receives slightly higher marks for quality of support at 8.2, with reviewers noting quicker response times and more helpful resources compared to Bamboo's 8.0 rating.
- Up to 10 jobs, Unlimited local agents, No remote agents
- All core features
- 10 projects, 10 tenants, and 10 machines
- Unlimited users
It's easy to use for easy things. Fortunately most of what I do is easy. It's harder to do harder things but in most cases it is possible to work within the constraints of the system. The documentation is pretty good once you figure out where it is. ...
Inability to define jobs as code. Everything is declarative, which is great when you're learning but not if you have multiple jobs that share the same properties with small variances.
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
It's easy to use for easy things. Fortunately most of what I do is easy. It's harder to do harder things but in most cases it is possible to work within the constraints of the system. The documentation is pretty good once you figure out where it is. ...
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
Inability to define jobs as code. Everything is declarative, which is great when you're learning but not if you have multiple jobs that share the same properties with small variances.
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
