Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Load Balancing Software
- Azure Traffic Manager
- Google Cloud Load Balancing
- Azure Traffic Manager-vs-Google Cloud Load Balancing
Compare Azure Traffic Manager and Google Cloud Load Balancing 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (35.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Traffic Manager
Star Rating
(50)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Traffic ManagerGoogle Cloud Load Balancing
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (35.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Load BalancingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud Load Balancing excels in its global load balancing capabilities, allowing for seamless traffic distribution across multiple regions, while Azure Traffic Manager is noted for its robust DNS-based traffic routing, which is particularly beneficial for users with a global audience.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Load Balancing has a slightly steeper learning curve, with an ease of use score of 8.4, compared to Azure Traffic Manager's 9.4, indicating that users find Azure's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight that Google Cloud Load Balancing's integration with other Google Cloud services is a significant advantage, providing a cohesive ecosystem for users already invested in Google’s platform, whereas Azure Traffic Manager is praised for its compatibility with a wide range of Microsoft services, making it a strong choice for enterprises already using Azure.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Load Balancing's support quality, rated at 8.5, is generally good, but Azure Traffic Manager shines with a higher support rating of 9.1, suggesting that Azure users feel more supported in their troubleshooting and operational needs.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud Load Balancing's product direction is highly rated at 9.6, indicating a strong commitment to innovation, while Azure Traffic Manager received a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting that users are extremely confident in its future development and enhancements.
- Users say that while both products have their strengths, Azure Traffic Manager's ability to handle complex routing scenarios with ease, as highlighted by its ease of setup score of 9.4, makes it a preferred choice for enterprises needing advanced traffic management solutions.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
(26)
Load Balancing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
(11)
Load Balancing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Traffic Manager
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Load Balancing
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Traffic Manager
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Load Balancing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.5
37
9.1
38
Ease of Use
9.4
37
8.7
38
Ease of Setup
9.4
19
8.8
28
Ease of Admin
9.3
18
8.8
23
Quality of Support
9.1
34
8.7
37
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
16
8.8
23
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
34
9.7
38
Features by Category
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Traffic Manager and Google Cloud Load Balancing are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Traffic Manager has no unique categories
Google Cloud Load Balancing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Traffic Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Computer Software
20.9%
Telecommunications
7.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.0%
Marketing and Advertising
4.7%
Other
37.2%
Computer Software
28.9%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Consulting
6.7%
Research
4.4%
Marketing and Advertising
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Most Helpful Reviews
Azure Traffic Manager
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Taskal S.
Verified User in Computer Software
Capability to add application URLs hosted in any Cloud Platform or On-Premises Network.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Retail
I would mention price here for enterprise. Also, reliability could be better.
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Andrew L.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
It's easy integration with other Google Cloud Platform Resources.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Taskal S.
Verified User in Computer Software
Capability to add application URLs hosted in any Cloud Platform or On-Premises Network.
Andrew L.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
It's easy integration with other Google Cloud Platform Resources.
Verified User in Retail
I would mention price here for enterprise. Also, reliability could be better.
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Traffic Manager has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Load Balancing has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
