Compare Azure SQL Database and Google Cloud SQL 
- Users report that Google Cloud SQL excels in network security with a score of 9.4, which reviewers mention provides robust protection for sensitive data, while Azure SQL Database scores slightly lower at 8.9.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud SQL's data replication feature is highly rated at 9.3, allowing for seamless data synchronization, whereas Azure SQL Database's replication feature received a score of 8.5, indicating room for improvement.
- G2 users highlight that Google Cloud SQL offers superior query language support with a score of 9.3, making it easier for developers to write complex queries, compared to Azure SQL Database's score of 9.2.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud SQL's disaster recovery capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.0, while Azure SQL Database's score of 8.9 suggests it may not be as robust in this critical area.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud SQL's application performance is rated at 9.2, which users appreciate for its speed and efficiency, while Azure SQL Database's performance is rated lower at 8.8.
- Users report that both products have strong backup and recovery features, scoring 9.0 for Google Cloud SQL and 9.2 for Azure SQL Database, but Azure's slightly higher score indicates a more reliable backup process according to user feedback.
- CPU and memory
- Other features are available only through on-demand model
The Windows Azure management portal itself and the ease at which services can be provisioned. The fact that services can be accessed as general availability prior to release, so you can start using it. The value for money is incredible. You only pay for...
I dislike about Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Database is very easy to work with, but it does have its limitations. It is not a relational database, so you aren't able to do anything that requires joins or other complex queries. You also don't have any...
It works most of the time, and the cost is pretty reasonable. There is support for my preferred SQL system -- PostgreSQL. The online administration interface is easy to use.
The Google Cloud team refuses to even give a timeline on when it will be deployed! All of their competitors already support MySQL 8.0, I really do not understand why it's taking so long.
The Windows Azure management portal itself and the ease at which services can be provisioned. The fact that services can be accessed as general availability prior to release, so you can start using it. The value for money is incredible. You only pay for...
It works most of the time, and the cost is pretty reasonable. There is support for my preferred SQL system -- PostgreSQL. The online administration interface is easy to use.
I dislike about Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Database is very easy to work with, but it does have its limitations. It is not a relational database, so you aren't able to do anything that requires joins or other complex queries. You also don't have any...
The Google Cloud team refuses to even give a timeline on when it will be deployed! All of their competitors already support MySQL 8.0, I really do not understand why it's taking so long.
