When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Azure Firewall easier to use and administer. Reviewers also felt that Azure Firewall was easier to do business with overall. However, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up.
I enjoy that this firewall has built-in high availability with unrestricted cloud scalability and of course FQDN filtering. Aside from that, this product can be integrated with Azure Cloud / Monitor for logging and analytics which is appreciated.
Missing some threat protection features offered by other NVAs. Can get comparable featureset by pairing with Application Gateways.
We have deployed a web application to the Azure environment and published it with the HTTPS connections. Afterward, we have enabled Azure Web Application Firewall and configured the rules that define the IPs to be validated and IPs to be blocked. It has a...
Azure security should work on provide a better architecture representation on how they are dealing with the vulnerability arising in the cloud security recently
I enjoy that this firewall has built-in high availability with unrestricted cloud scalability and of course FQDN filtering. Aside from that, this product can be integrated with Azure Cloud / Monitor for logging and analytics which is appreciated.
We have deployed a web application to the Azure environment and published it with the HTTPS connections. Afterward, we have enabled Azure Web Application Firewall and configured the rules that define the IPs to be validated and IPs to be blocked. It has a...
Missing some threat protection features offered by other NVAs. Can get comparable featureset by pairing with Application Gateways.
Azure security should work on provide a better architecture representation on how they are dealing with the vulnerability arising in the cloud security recently