- Home
- ...
- Continuous Integration Tools
- Azure DevOps Server
- JetBrains Space
- Azure DevOps Server-vs-JetBrains Space
Compare Azure DevOps Server and JetBrains Space 
- Users report that Azure DevOps Server excels in its "Deployment-Ready Staging" feature, scoring an impressive 8.9, which allows teams to efficiently manage their deployment processes. In contrast, JetBrains Space does not have a comparable feature, which may limit its deployment capabilities for larger projects.
- Reviewers mention that Azure DevOps Server's "Integration" capabilities are rated at 8.6, providing seamless connections with various tools and services. However, JetBrains Space shines with a higher score of 8.9 in "Integrations," indicating a broader range of built-in integrations that cater to small businesses looking for an all-in-one solution.
- G2 users highlight Azure DevOps Server's "Extensibility" with a score of 8.5, allowing for custom plugins and extensions. Conversely, JetBrains Space, with a score of 8.4 in "Extensibility," offers a more user-friendly approach to customization, making it easier for small teams to adapt the software to their needs.
- Users on G2 report that Azure DevOps Server's "Processes and Workflow" management feature scores an 8.9, which is particularly beneficial for enterprise-level projects requiring complex workflows. JetBrains Space, while scoring slightly lower at 8.7, is praised for its intuitive interface that simplifies workflow management for smaller teams.
- Reviewers mention that Azure DevOps Server's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.2, which is decent but may not meet the expectations of users needing immediate assistance. In contrast, JetBrains Space boasts a higher score of 8.9, with users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of their support team.
- Users say that Azure DevOps Server's "Automation" features score an 8.5, providing robust automation capabilities for repetitive tasks. However, JetBrains Space outperforms with a score of 8.8, with reviewers highlighting its user-friendly automation setup that allows teams to streamline their processes more effectively.
- 4,000 CI credits per month
- 10 GB of storage per user
- 50 GB of data transfer per user/month
I love TFS. I love the way it tracks bugs, I love the way it manages and tracks deployments to different environments, and I love the way it manages test cases, test plans, requirements, and features, as well as tasks. Our company currently has it set up so...
The thing with TFS is that it seems to require a lot of manteinance and configuration because most of the times even setting up a new project is a mess that causes the code to be copied multiple times over the computer's filesystem, some files are ignored...
The solution to the own challenges of the Space programmers
When it comes to the downside of JetSpace is its installation. This takes a little time as compared to its competitors. Moreover, if it can provide us with more information in a readable pdf, that will be useful.
I love TFS. I love the way it tracks bugs, I love the way it manages and tracks deployments to different environments, and I love the way it manages test cases, test plans, requirements, and features, as well as tasks. Our company currently has it set up so...
The solution to the own challenges of the Space programmers
The thing with TFS is that it seems to require a lot of manteinance and configuration because most of the times even setting up a new project is a mess that causes the code to be copied multiple times over the computer's filesystem, some files are ignored...
When it comes to the downside of JetSpace is its installation. This takes a little time as compared to its competitors. Moreover, if it can provide us with more information in a readable pdf, that will be useful.
