Compare Azure Blob Storage and IBM Cloud Object Storage 
- Users report that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a strong versioning feature, rated at 8.7, which allows for easy management of data changes, while Azure Blob Storage excels in scalability with a score of 9.3, making it a better choice for businesses anticipating rapid growth.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Blob Storage offers superior ease of use, scoring 9.1 compared to IBM's 8.0, indicating that users find Azure's interface more intuitive and user-friendly, which can significantly reduce the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a solid redundancy rating of 8.8, ensuring data is backed up effectively, whereas Azure Blob Storage shines in availability with a score of 9.1, suggesting it is more reliable for mission-critical applications that require constant uptime.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Blob Storage's encryption capabilities are robust, with a score of 9.2, providing peace of mind for businesses concerned about data security, while IBM's encryption features, although good, do not match this level of confidence.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a slightly lower quality of support rating at 8.0 compared to Azure's 8.8, indicating that users may experience better assistance and faster resolution times with Azure's support team.
- Users say that Azure Blob Storage's cloud migration tools are more efficient and user-friendly, which is crucial for businesses looking to transition to the cloud seamlessly, while IBM's migration tools may require more technical expertise to navigate effectively.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
I don’t like having to train others on this software because they sometimes try to create their own way to use it and create unnecessary issues.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
I don’t like having to train others on this software because they sometimes try to create their own way to use it and create unnecessary issues.
