Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Load Balancing Software
- Azure Application Gateway
- F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
- Azure Application Gateway-vs-F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Compare Azure Application Gateway and F5 NGINX Ingress Controller 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Application Gateway
Star Rating
(200)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Application GatewayF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Star Rating
(17)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about F5 NGINX Ingress ControllerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Application Gateway excels in security monitoring with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities that provide advanced threat protection. In contrast, while F5 NGINX Ingress Controller also offers security features, reviewers mention that its security monitoring is slightly less comprehensive, scoring 8.6.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Application Gateway's logging and reporting features are highly rated at 9.1, with users appreciating the detailed insights it provides for traffic analysis. On the other hand, F5 NGINX Ingress Controller, while functional, has received mixed feedback on its reporting capabilities, leading to a lower score of 8.6.
- Users on G2 highlight that Azure Application Gateway has a strong performance and reliability score of 9.2, with many praising its ability to handle large volumes of traffic seamlessly. Conversely, F5 NGINX Ingress Controller, while reliable, has been noted by reviewers to occasionally struggle under peak loads, resulting in a slightly lower performance score of 8.8.
- G2 users report that Azure Application Gateway's ease of setup is rated at 8.4, with many finding the configuration process straightforward, especially for those already using other Azure services. In contrast, F5 NGINX Ingress Controller scores higher at 9.0, with users mentioning its flexibility and ease of integration into existing Kubernetes environments.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Application Gateway's application-layer controls are rated at 9.4, with users appreciating its ability to manage traffic based on URL paths and host headers. F5 NGINX Ingress Controller also offers strong application-layer controls but scores slightly lower at 9.2, with some users noting that its configuration can be more complex.
- Users say that Azure Application Gateway has a solid product direction score of 9.0, indicating a positive outlook for future updates and features. In comparison, F5 NGINX Ingress Controller has a slightly higher score of 9.3, with reviewers expressing confidence in its ongoing development and support for modern application architectures.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
(11)
Container Networking
Visit Website
Sponsored
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
(26)
Container Networking
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Application Gateway
No pricing availableF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Application Gateway
No trial information availableF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
137
9.3
16
Ease of Use
8.7
137
9.1
16
Ease of Setup
8.4
94
9.0
14
Ease of Admin
8.6
89
8.8
14
Quality of Support
8.5
135
9.3
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
87
9.4
12
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
125
9.3
16
Features by Category
Analysis
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
Controls
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
9.0
5
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Application Gateway and F5 NGINX Ingress Controller are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Application Gateway is categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller is categorized as Container Networking
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Application Gateway
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.8%
Computer Software
11.4%
Computer & Network Security
5.7%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Hospital & Health Care
3.4%
Other
47.7%
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Internet
11.8%
Computer & Network Security
11.8%
Consulting
5.9%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Other
35.3%
Most Helpful Reviews
Azure Application Gateway
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Emer K.
Verified User in Media Production
The proper solution for migrating on-premise apps to the cloud. Several steps of installation and configuration.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Education Management
Too many options needed to be explained.
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Marlon Jose P.
Verified User in Government Administration
His capacity to manage the ingress request based on content
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
Emer K.
Verified User in Media Production
The proper solution for migrating on-premise apps to the cloud. Several steps of installation and configuration.
Marlon Jose P.
Verified User in Government Administration
His capacity to manage the ingress request based on content
Verified User in Education Management
Too many options needed to be explained.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
Alternatives
Discussions
The text appears to be a repetition of the same sequence of letters, which does not form recognizable words in any known language. It may be a placeholder or nonsensical text.
1 comment
EA
The string "ccczzz" does not contain recognizable words or phrases in any known language, so it cannot be translated into English. It may be a sequence of...Read more
What is the best way I can use App gateway for multiple applications ?
1 comment
AD
You'd configure your applications to all live under separate domains, subdomains or paths behind your application gateway.
Consider having WordPress CMS,...Read more
Azure Application Gateway has no more discussions with answers
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
