When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls overall.
AWS WAF protects web applications from common web exploities. The user can create a policy and take control over the block and filters. AWS WAF can easily be integrated and managed by the Amazon firewall manager and can be easily implemented in the Amazon...
Any thing above basic is expensive. So it is not cost efficient to use for the applications on cheaper markets.
Palo Alto's web interface is incredibly simple to use. For such a robust firewall with so many features, it is incredibly easy to use. Documentation is abundant and I have never had an issue finding what I need.
Price is a bit extreme. The web gui is absolutely rubbish. It locks up and takes forever to load.devices are extremely expensive.
AWS WAF protects web applications from common web exploities. The user can create a policy and take control over the block and filters. AWS WAF can easily be integrated and managed by the Amazon firewall manager and can be easily implemented in the Amazon...
Palo Alto's web interface is incredibly simple to use. For such a robust firewall with so many features, it is incredibly easy to use. Documentation is abundant and I have never had an issue finding what I need.
Any thing above basic is expensive. So it is not cost efficient to use for the applications on cheaper markets.
Price is a bit extreme. The web gui is absolutely rubbish. It locks up and takes forever to load.devices are extremely expensive.