Compare AWS WAF and FortiGate-VM 
AWS WAF vs FortiGate-VM
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found FortiGate-VM easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with FortiGate-VM overall.
- Reviewers felt that FortiGate-VM meets the needs of their business better than AWS WAF.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that FortiGate-VM is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of FortiGate-VM over AWS WAF.
AWS WAF protects web applications from common web exploities. The user can create a policy and take control over the block and filters. AWS WAF can easily be integrated and managed by the Amazon firewall manager and can be easily implemented in the Amazon...
While setup is easy, doing non trivial things with it still requires too much work, and often feels brittle. I'm directly comparing this against cloudflare.
fortigate is friendly user, and rules can be easily implemented and we had a very good customer support, i have used it for 2 years and there are n no of features like cloud, firewall anti virus, vpn etc t integrates with multivendor environments, including...
Cant back up the FortiGate VM like any other VM in azure
AWS WAF protects web applications from common web exploities. The user can create a policy and take control over the block and filters. AWS WAF can easily be integrated and managed by the Amazon firewall manager and can be easily implemented in the Amazon...
fortigate is friendly user, and rules can be easily implemented and we had a very good customer support, i have used it for 2 years and there are n no of features like cloud, firewall anti virus, vpn etc t integrates with multivendor environments, including...
While setup is easy, doing non trivial things with it still requires too much work, and often feels brittle. I'm directly comparing this against cloudflare.
Cant back up the FortiGate VM like any other VM in azure
