- Home
- ...
- Container Management Software
- AWS Fargate
- Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Container Engine for Kubernetes
- AWS Fargate-vs-Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Container Engine for Kubernetes
Compare AWS Fargate and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Container Engine for Kubernetes 
- Users report that AWS Fargate excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to quickly deploy containerized applications. In contrast, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Container Engine for Kubernetes has a lower score of 6.0, indicating a more complex setup process that may require additional time and resources.
- Reviewers mention that AWS Fargate's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is significantly higher than Oracle's 6.9. This suggests that users of AWS Fargate feel more supported and valued, which can be crucial for businesses relying on timely assistance.
- G2 users highlight AWS Fargate's strong performance in meeting requirements with a score of 9.0, while Oracle's score of 7.9 indicates that it may not fully meet the diverse needs of its users, potentially leading to dissatisfaction in specific use cases.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar access control and file isolation features, both scoring 8.7 and 8.3 respectively. This parity suggests that users can expect robust security measures from either platform.
- Reviewers say that AWS Fargate shines in its developer toolkit, scoring 8.4, which is essential for teams looking to streamline their development processes. Oracle's offerings in this area are less emphasized, which may impact developer productivity.
- Users report that AWS Fargate's orchestration capabilities, rated at 8.6, provide a more seamless experience compared to Oracle's offerings, which may not be as intuitive or user-friendly, potentially leading to longer deployment times.
Deploying applications without managing infrastructure management is a great advantage.Pay for what you use model is good. In other clouds, somewhat similar service is there but we prefer AWS as we have our production designed and running on AWS.
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
OCI is a great cloud platform which provides a plethora of services like other cloud providers. Container Engine for Kubernetes works seamlessly on this platform.
The support is very slow. It takes too long to resolve tickets and issues. It is very hard to get in contact with experts.
Deploying applications without managing infrastructure management is a great advantage.Pay for what you use model is good. In other clouds, somewhat similar service is there but we prefer AWS as we have our production designed and running on AWS.
OCI is a great cloud platform which provides a plethora of services like other cloud providers. Container Engine for Kubernetes works seamlessly on this platform.
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
The support is very slow. It takes too long to resolve tickets and issues. It is very hard to get in contact with experts.
