- Home
- ...
- Other IT Infrastructure Software
- AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK)
- Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services
- AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK)-vs-Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services
Compare AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) and Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services 
- Users report that Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services excels in its performance and scalability, particularly for small businesses, with reviewers mentioning that the bare metal servers provide high levels of customization and control over resources.
- Reviewers mention that AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) shines in its ease of use and integration with existing AWS services, with users on G2 highlighting the seamless deployment process and the ability to define cloud infrastructure using familiar programming languages.
- G2 users indicate that Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services has a strong quality of support, with many reviewers saying that the support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial for businesses that require immediate assistance.
- Users say that AWS CDK offers a more extensive library of pre-built components, allowing for faster development cycles, while reviewers mention that this feature significantly reduces the time needed to set up complex cloud architectures.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have similar star ratings, Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services is particularly favored by small businesses for its cost-effectiveness, whereas AWS CDK is preferred by enterprises for its robust feature set and flexibility.
- Users report that the product direction for AWS CDK is viewed positively, with a score of 9.5, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation, while Oracle Bare Metal Cloud Services has a slightly lower score of 8.5, suggesting room for growth in future developments.
I like that there are so many options when filtering with AWS. You can filter by trend, agent, channel, duration, as well as have access to historical and agent data. If you are working in an RTA position, AWS is a great tool to meeting 95/105, adherence...
Amazon is since trending therefore AWS CDK got a fame but it has every single feature which is required and going forward in future our preference will be to use AWS CDK and its components only so no more stuff to dislike about it.
The bare metal service provides, a low latency, great performance, a secure environment, with no need of a hypervisor or agent, this provides better consistancy for application calls.
It's needs to include more market IOS as well to load on or if customer may ask for serverless architecture.
I like that there are so many options when filtering with AWS. You can filter by trend, agent, channel, duration, as well as have access to historical and agent data. If you are working in an RTA position, AWS is a great tool to meeting 95/105, adherence...
The bare metal service provides, a low latency, great performance, a secure environment, with no need of a hypervisor or agent, this provides better consistancy for application calls.
Amazon is since trending therefore AWS CDK got a fame but it has every single feature which is required and going forward in future our preference will be to use AWS CDK and its components only so no more stuff to dislike about it.
It's needs to include more market IOS as well to load on or if customer may ask for serverless architecture.
