Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
- Home
- ...
- Simulation & CAE Software
- Autodesk CFD
- SolidWorks Flow Simulation
- Autodesk CFD-vs-SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Compare Autodesk CFD and SolidWorks Flow Simulation 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Autodesk CFD
Star Rating
(31)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Autodesk CFDSolidWorks Flow Simulation
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SolidWorks Flow SimulationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Autodesk CFD excels in fluid analysis with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust capabilities in simulating complex fluid dynamics, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation received a lower score of 8.1, indicating it may not handle intricate fluid scenarios as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk CFD's command clarity is rated at 9.0, making it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software efficiently, whereas SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.8, may present slight challenges in command understanding.
- G2 users indicate that Autodesk CFD's integration capabilities are rated at 9.0, allowing seamless collaboration with other Autodesk products, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, rated at 8.5, may not offer the same level of integration with external tools.
- Users on G2 report that Autodesk CFD's documentation is rated at 8.7, providing comprehensive guidance for users, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation's documentation, rated at 8.3, may lack some depth, leading to potential confusion for new users.
- Reviewers say that Autodesk CFD shines in its simulation capabilities, scoring 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for users needing detailed analysis, while SolidWorks Flow Simulation, with a score of 8.3, may not deliver the same level of detail in simulations.
- Users report that Autodesk CFD has a higher quality of support, rated at 8.8, which is crucial for troubleshooting and user assistance, compared to SolidWorks Flow Simulation's support rating of 8.3, indicating a potential gap in user support experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autodesk CFD
No pricing availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing availableFree Trial
Autodesk CFD
No trial information availableSolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
22
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.8
22
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
21
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
19
7.1
28
Features by Category
Design
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Work
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Design
8.6
14
8.8
8
8.6
15
8.3
8
8.8
15
7.7
8
8.7
15
7.7
8
Tools
9.4
15
8.1
8
9.1
15
7.7
8
8.8
15
8.1
8
Work
8.6
14
8.3
8
8.4
15
8.5
8
8.8
15
8.3
8
8.1
14
7.7
8
9.0
14
8.5
8
Environment
8.6
14
8.1
8
8.5
14
8.3
8
8.7
14
9.0
8
9.0
15
8.8
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Autodesk CFD and SolidWorks Flow Simulation are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Autodesk CFD has no unique categories
SolidWorks Flow Simulation is categorized as MEP
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Autodesk CFD
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
20.0%
Oil & Energy
10.0%
Higher Education
10.0%
Design
10.0%
Manufacturing
6.7%
Other
43.3%
Information Technology and Services
21.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.1%
Design
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Automotive
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
Autodesk CFD
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Dr. Kurmendra, P.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
Fastness and accuracy are the two parameters which attracts me
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Machinery
It lacks a lot of features, such as the ability to change the type of mesh (for example, from triangles to quad).
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Design
The contraints are pretty easy to apply as compared to software like Ansys.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Not the most accurate, hard to adjust fluid properties
Dr. Kurmendra, P.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
Fastness and accuracy are the two parameters which attracts me
Verified User in Design
The contraints are pretty easy to apply as compared to software like Ansys.
Verified User in Machinery
It lacks a lot of features, such as the ability to change the type of mesh (for example, from triangles to quad).
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Not the most accurate, hard to adjust fluid properties
Alternatives
Discussions
Autodesk CFD has no discussions with answers
SolidWorks Flow Simulation has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
