Compare ASP.NET and Ruby on Rails 
- Users report that ASP.NET has a robust framework for building enterprise-level applications, which is particularly beneficial for mid-market companies looking for scalability and performance. In contrast, Ruby on Rails is praised for its rapid development capabilities, making it a favorite among small businesses that need to launch applications quickly.
- Reviewers mention that ASP.NET's integration with Microsoft products, such as Azure, provides a seamless experience for users already within the Microsoft ecosystem. On the other hand, users on G2 highlight Ruby on Rails' convention over configuration approach, which simplifies the development process and reduces the time spent on setup.
- G2 users indicate that ASP.NET has a steeper learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with C# or the .NET framework, while Ruby on Rails is often described as more beginner-friendly, allowing new developers to become productive more quickly.
- Users say that the quality of support for ASP.NET is solid, but some reviewers mention that response times can vary, whereas Ruby on Rails users report a more consistent support experience, particularly from the community and open-source resources.
- Reviewers mention that ASP.NET's performance is generally superior for large-scale applications, with features like asynchronous programming and caching mechanisms. In contrast, users report that Ruby on Rails excels in rapid prototyping and has a rich set of gems that enhance functionality without extensive coding.
- Users on G2 highlight that ASP.NET's security features are robust, making it a preferred choice for applications that handle sensitive data. Conversely, Ruby on Rails users appreciate the framework's built-in security measures, but some reviewers express concerns about vulnerabilities if best practices are not followed.
Personly I like ASP.NET, i did work in php as well, but enjoyed working in asp.net, have one of best developemnt envoirnment , easier to use & maintain, you coding /development very fast. Even if look you at its web forms features like master pages,...
In this case is getting behind a lot , other IDEs are third party components friendly and working pretty agile in any machine , with ASP.NET now is really heavy to work and develop a pretty simple web get really big , other that for me a is a huge minus is...
I really love developing with dynamic languages, and Ruby is clean, fun and very flexible to use.
Since the framework was introduced lately, the implementation examples and lack of proper documentation was a point of pain for us.
Personly I like ASP.NET, i did work in php as well, but enjoyed working in asp.net, have one of best developemnt envoirnment , easier to use & maintain, you coding /development very fast. Even if look you at its web forms features like master pages,...
I really love developing with dynamic languages, and Ruby is clean, fun and very flexible to use.
In this case is getting behind a lot , other IDEs are third party components friendly and working pretty agile in any machine , with ASP.NET now is really heavy to work and develop a pretty simple web get really big , other that for me a is a huge minus is...
Since the framework was introduced lately, the implementation examples and lack of proper documentation was a point of pain for us.
