Compare Applied Epic and BindHQ 
- Users report that Applied Epic excels in its Contact Management feature, scoring an impressive 8.5, which reviewers mention allows for seamless organization and tracking of client interactions.
- Reviewers mention that BindHQ shines in Policy Management, achieving a high score of 8.9, with users praising its intuitive interface that simplifies the management of insurance policies.
- G2 users highlight that Applied Epic's Quality of Support is a strong point, with a score of 8.8, indicating that users feel well-supported and valued when seeking assistance.
- Users on G2 report that BindHQ's Claims Management feature, scoring 8.2, is particularly effective, with reviewers noting its automated workflows that streamline the claims process.
- Reviewers mention that Applied Epic's Ease of Setup is a drawback, with a lower score of 6.9, suggesting that new users may face challenges during initial implementation.
- Users say that BindHQ's Payment Processing integration, with a score of 7.4, could be improved, as some users have experienced delays in transaction processing, impacting their overall satisfaction.
- CRM
- Policy Lifecycle Management
- Document Management
Capability and versatiity. Customer Support is very good when we need to work with them. Normally, they are able to resolve the problem on the first phone call.
Many of the users giving good reviews have limited tech experience and don't know how much better it could be. The system is clunky. Ever simple task has 3-5 supporting tasks that go with it. There is no such thing as a 1 - 3 click piece to this system. We...
I love how easy it is to document and organize our files. Also, the team is very attentive to feedback, and they are always making the site better!
The terminology used is inaccurate. The flow of the GL and CP pages is average. The lack of email out functions is an issue. The Brokerage Manager is half-built. The lack of an efficient Renewal Process is absurd.
Capability and versatiity. Customer Support is very good when we need to work with them. Normally, they are able to resolve the problem on the first phone call.
I love how easy it is to document and organize our files. Also, the team is very attentive to feedback, and they are always making the site better!
Many of the users giving good reviews have limited tech experience and don't know how much better it could be. The system is clunky. Ever simple task has 3-5 supporting tasks that go with it. There is no such thing as a 1 - 3 click piece to this system. We...
The terminology used is inaccurate. The flow of the GL and CP pages is average. The lack of email out functions is an issue. The Brokerage Manager is half-built. The lack of an efficient Renewal Process is absurd.
