Compare Flow and LinearB 
- Users report that Pluralsight Flow excels in its Repository Integration with a score of 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various code repositories, while LinearB offers a slightly higher score of 9.0, indicating a more robust integration experience.
- Reviewers mention that LinearB shines in Quality of Support, achieving a remarkable score of 9.5 compared to Pluralsight Flow's 8.0, suggesting that users find LinearB's customer service more responsive and helpful.
- G2 users highlight that Pluralsight Flow's Planning Tools score of 6.5 falls short compared to LinearB's 8.1, indicating that users may find LinearB's planning features more comprehensive and user-friendly for project management.
- Users on G2 report that LinearB's Communication Tools score of 8.2 significantly outperforms Pluralsight Flow's 5.6, suggesting that LinearB provides better options for team collaboration and communication.
- Reviewers say that both products perform well in Analytics and Trends, but LinearB's score of 9.0 indicates a more advanced analytics capability, allowing teams to derive deeper insights from their data compared to Pluralsight Flow's 8.5.
- Users mention that while both products offer Impact Predictions, LinearB's higher score of 8.6 suggests it provides more accurate forecasting tools, helping teams better understand the potential outcomes of their projects compared to Pluralsight Flow's 7.6.
- All fundamental metrics
- Retrospective
- Proficiency
- No credit card required
- 5-minute self-onboard
- Upgrade any time
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
